July 28, 2014

The Federal Trade Commison's New Hart-Scott-Rodino Act: New filing thresholds will significantly impact 2013 deals

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) recently announced the 2013 filing thresholds under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (“HSR”). The thresholds determine whether parties involved in mergers, acquisitions, transfers of voting securities or unincorporated interests, or other transactions, such as exclusive licensing deals or joint ventures, must notify the FTC and the Department of Justice of the proposed transaction. Deals that meet the HSR filing thresholds must be reported (absent any applicable exemptions) to the agencies, and the parties must comply with a mandatory waiting period before consummating the transaction to allow the agencies to determine whether the transaction raises potential antitrust/competitive concerns. 

The HSR filing thresholds are adjusted each year based on changes in the gross national product. The 2013 filing thresholds take effect on February 11, 2013. Any deal reported before that date remains subject to the 2012 filing thresholds. 

For 2013, the filing thresholds are:

Deal Value

Size of Person Test


Less than $70.9 million

Not applicable

Generally not reportable

$70.9 million but less than $283.6 million

One party has net sales or assets of at least $14.2 million and the other party has net sales or assets of at least $141.8 million

Generally reportable if size of person test is met.

$283.6 million or greater

Not applicable

Generally reportable

For purposes of the “Size of Person” test, the net sales or assets of each party’s “ultimate parent” (including all entities controlled by the parent) is considered as the party’s net sales or assets. 

The FTC also announced an increase in HSR filing fees, effective the same day. The new HSR filing fees are:

Deal Value

Filing Fee

At least $70.9 million but less than $141.8 million


At least $141.8 million but less than $709.1 million


$709.1 million or greater


The HSR Act has certain exceptions that can exempt facially reportable transactions from HSR filing requirements. Parties should be mindful of these exemptions and other HSR rules when determining whether a filing is required.

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author


Tammy Imhoff is an Associate in the Corporate Department. Tammy concentrates her practice on corporate law and transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, antitrust and competition law counseling, preparation and review of contracts, forming new businesses, and general corporate governance matters.


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.