May 23, 2012

Formaldehyde Permitting And Toxic Tort Litigation On The Rise?

In its June 2, 2010Toxicological Review of Formaldehyde Inhalation Assessment, EPA indicated that formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen.  The publicity associated with this assessment has already caught the attention of toxic tort lawyers who believe that formaldehyde exposure cases could arise in the same manner, and with the same proclivity, as benzene litigation.

Formaldehyde, similar to benzene, presents an indoor air issue because of its use in so many applications that we take for granted.  Think "new carpet" or "new car" smell.  Now substitute "formaldehyde" for "new" and the breadth of potential litigation against a wide array of manufacturers and service providers becomes apparent.

Formaldehyde may also become an additional thorn in the side of heavy industry seeking to renew Title V permits under the Clean Air Act for ambient air pollutants.  42 U.S.C. §§ 7661 et seq.40 C.F.R. Parts 70-71.  Many combustion sources have formaldehyde emissions, such as compressor stations.  Previous experience litigating over the treatment of formaldehyde emissions in Title V permits reveals limited information or experience with technologies or other methods to test for, or ultimately reduce, formaldehyde emissions.  EPA's recent assessment now threatens to turn up the heat on formaldehyde.  Industry may not like this "new car smell."

©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

A member of Greenberg Traurig's Litigation and Environmental Groups, Mr. Davies also has experience in Product Liability and Mass Torts, White Collar Criminal Defense, Mergers and Acquisitions and Private Equity. As a member of the Litigation Group, his experience encompasses assisting pharmaceutical and industrial clients in responding to governmental investigations and criminal prosecutions, and a range of civil matters, including acting as independent counsel for senior business managers and scientists involved in civil and criminal actions.

215-988-7814

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.