Advertisement

May 20, 2013

House Hearings on Litigation Costs Paid by the Government in Endangered Species Act Cases

On Tuesday, June 19, 2012, U.S. Rep. Doc Hastings (Chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee) held a hearing entitled "Taxpayer Funded Litigation: Benefitting Lawyers and Harming Species, Jobs and Schools."  The hearing was a successor to the Committee's December hearing entitled "The Endangered Species Act: How Litigation is Costing Jobs and Impeding True Recovery Efforts."  The objective of both hearings was to garner information on the drain (financial and labor) of ESA litigation on the resources of the federal agencies, especially the Fish & Wildlife Service. 

Prior to the hearing, Rep. Hastings requested information from the Department of Justice (DOJ) relative to the Endangered Species Act (ESA) cases handled by DOJ since 2009, their status, and the amount of attorneys fees or court costs paid.  DOJ's letter response and associated back-up materials of May 8,  2012, are attached here.  Rep. Hastings continues to request information from DOJ or the federal agencies and seems to be concentrating on 4 major cases, including the Florida Key deer litigation in which more than $1.9 million was paid to plaintiffs' counsel.  

To put this into perspective, between March 2001 and September 2010, the U.S. Government reportedly paid more than $21 million in attorneys fees and costs in ESA litigation or settlements.  These amounts are typically paid from the Treasury Department's Judgment Fund as opposed to the particular wildlife agency's budget. 

©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Co-Chair, National Environmental and Land Development Practice

Kerri L. Barsh practices environmental compliance including permitting, enforcement and litigation, and land use law.  Kerri has represented public and private clients on environmental issues including mold, hazardous waste regulatory and liability matters; wetlands and coastal permitting; air quality permitting; petroleum product contamination; and other compliance and enforcement matters.

305-579-0772

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.