Advertisement

May 21, 2013

HUD Revamps FHA Lending Requirements

On September 23, 2011, HUD issued Mortgagee Letter 2011-34 (the "Letter"). The provisions of the Letter, which became effective immediately upon the Letter's release, dramatically revamp requirements for FHA-approved lenders. Most significantly, HUD has expanded the single family origination lending area of each home office and registered branch office to include all HUD field office jurisdictions. Previously, a specific office could only make loans in a particular geographic lending area. Under the rules set forth in the Letter, an FHA single-family lender may make loans on a nationwide basis out of any home or registered branch office, provided that the lender independently meets the loan origination requirements of each state in which the loans are made. This represents a major expansion of the ability of FHA lenders to make loans nationally, and for those lenders able to meet the net worth and other requirements of the FHA now and in the future, will facilitate nationwide FHA lending activities.

The Letter also amends HUD's requirements regarding office facilities. The Letter states that an FHA-approved lender may conduct loan origination and/or servicing activities from its home office, branch office, and/or direct lending branch office, as long as the office facilities fully comply with all state licensing requirements in the jurisdiction where the office is located. In addition, while HUD reiterated that a mortgagee's home office must comply with the requirements set forth in paragraph 2-11.A of Handbook 4060.1 (i.e., have adequate office space and equipment, be in a location conducive to mortgage lending, be in a commercial space that is separate and apart from any other entity, display a fair housing poster and be clearly identified to the public, including a permanently affixed business sign), HUD rescinded these same requirements for traditional branch offices as well as the requirement that the traditional branch office provide privacy for conducting interviews, rescinded the requirements that non-traditional branch offices meet branch office staffing requirements, have adequate office space and equipment, conform to local governmental use requirements and display a fair housing poster if the public is ever received, and rescinded the requirements that a direct lending branch office meet the office facilities and staff requirements of a branch office and have a separate manager. Furthermore, applicants are no longer required to submit evidence of acceptable home office facilities as part of the mortgagee approval process, which means that applicants need no longer submit photographs and a floor plan for the facilities, or a certification that the facilities comply with FHA requirements; Instead, HUD will verify compliance with these requirements through any on-site visits to the home office.

The Letter also reiterates HUD's position on net branching arrangements. Typically, net branching is a practice whereby a party other than the FHA-approved lender (often the branch manager) pays some or all of the branch office's expenses (including through escrow arrangements), is responsible for losses of the branch office, or may be a lessor or sublessor of the branch office or branch office equipment. HUD disallows these arrangements, and requires FHA-approved lenders to pay all operating expenses of each of their home, branch and direct lending offices. Apparently some lenders are still engaging in prohibited net branching arrangements, as HUD reaffirmed in the Letter that FHA-approved lenders may not engage in prohibited net branching activities.

The Letter made a number of additional technical changes with respect to applications for FHA approval, including the manner in which officers and owners of the applicant are to be identified, and the background information that must be submitted for officers.  

Copyright © 2013, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Partner

Mr. Sands is a partner in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm's Los Angeles office. 
 

213-617-5536

About the Author

Senior Attorney

Mr. Root is a senior attorney in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm's Los Angeles office.

213-617-5465

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.