May 24, 2012

Immigration Law: Export Control Question Delayed for L-1, H-1B and O-1A Visa Cases

Immigration Group
Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Immigration / Labor & Employment
All Federal / All International
Printer-friendly
Email this Article
Download PDF
Reprints & Permissions

On December 22, 2010, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that employers will not be required to complete Part 6 of the Form I-129 Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker form containing export control /  ITAR compliance questions, until February 20, 2011. The decision to delay requiring answers to these questions comes after USCIS consulted with stakeholders, including the Commerce Department, who recommended that employers be given additional time to establish internal processes to answer the questions correctly. Although employers must use the Form I-129 petition that bears the November 23, 2010 revision date, USCIS will not require the Part 6 questions to be completed.

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Immigration Group

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP’s Immigration Group represents a wide range of publicly traded companies, multi-national corporations, privately held businesses, universities, research institutions, arts and entertainment organizations, professors, and professionals with respect to both work visa and permanent resident (green card) cases. Led by two partners long recognized in the field of immigration law, the group has significant experience in many other areas related to the U.S. immigration system, including visa applications at United States Consulates, labor certification proceedings...

gregory.adams@dinsmore.com
513-977-8125
www.dinsmore.com

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.