Advertisement

May 25, 2013

Institutional Shareholder Services ("ISS") Announces New Governance QuickScore Will Replace Governance Risk Indicators (GRId) to Identify Risks Within a Company

Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) recently announced that, effective in late February or early March, it is replacing its Governance Risk Indicators (GRId) database with the new ISS Governance QuickScore (QuickScore), which is designed to quantitatively identify risks within a company.

Although GRId and QuickScore both attempt to measure governance risk, QuickScore is a more quantitatively driven system that searches for relationships between governance factors and important financial metrics, with an overlay that aligns qualitative aspects of governance with ISS policy. The quantitative methodology is based on ISS’s best practices as to numerous governance factors. Additionally, where GRId provided a color-coded scoring of qualitative risk factors, QuickScore assigns a numeric score based on four governance dimensions: board, compensation, shareholder rights and audit.

Initially, QuickScore will rate over 4,000 companies within 25 markets, including the 3,000 largest US companies by market cap, the 250 largest Canadian companies by market cap and United Kingdom, Europe, Japan and Asia Pacific companies in the MSCI-EAFE index. Companies rated by QuickScore have been granted access to ISS’s free data verification site, where they can review data ISS has collected on the QuickScore factors. Companies will have the ability to submit requests to ISS for data changes or updates through this site until February 15, at which time it will close until QuickScore is launched. ISS intends to begin including a covered company’s QuickScore in its proxy research reports beginning in late February or early March.

Additional information regarding QuickScore is available here.

©2013 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

About the Author

Partner

Mark Wood is co-head of Katten's Securities Practice, concentrating his practice in corporate and securities law. Mr. Wood represents issuers and investment banks in IPOs and other public offerings and private placements of equity and debt securities and in other securities matters. He also represents clients in complex corporate transactions, including tender offers, mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, going private transactions, private equity investments, joint ventures and strategic alliances, and is a leading practitioner in representing investors, public companies...

312-902-5493

About the Author

Partner

Kathleen H. Moriarty concentrates her practice on financial services matters. She has extensive experience in the establishment and representation of exchange-traded investment companies (ETFs) and was instrumental in the early development of the structure, creation and registration of Standard & Poor’s depository receipts (SPDRs). She has also advised clients on the establishment of various other US ETFs, including iShares, Vanguard Exchange-Traded Funds (VIPERS), ProShares, WisdomTree and IndexIQ. Ms. Moriarty has been actively involved with ETF projects globally, including...

212-940-6304

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.