May 24, 2012

IRS Modifies M&P and Volume Submitter Determination Letter Procedures

In Revenue Procedure 2011-49, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has modified the procedures by which it issues opinion and advisory letters to Master or Prototype (M&P) and Volume Submitter retirement plans (together, pre-approved plans).  In addition, the guidance clarifies the limited types of employermodifications and amendments that can be made without causing an M&P or Volume Submitter plan to fail to be “identical” to an approved M&P or Volume Submitter plan (and, therefore, to fail to be covered by the pre-approved plan’s advisory or opinion letter).  Acceptable changes include the following:

  • Selecting options permitted under the applicable plan 
  • Specifying or changing the effective date of a provision (to the extent allowed under the applicable plan)
  • Adopting certain interim or discretionary amendments
  • Adopting certain IRS-approved model or sample amendments 

Prior guidance that allowed employers to modify or amend plans to correct typographical errors and/or cross-references has been eliminated.

The new guidance also provides that neither M&P opinion letters nor Volume Submitter advisory letters will cover hybrid plans, plans with section 401(h) accounts (medical benefits), or plans covered by Internal Revenue Code Section 414(x) (small employer combined defined benefit/defined contribution plans).  Numerous other pre-approved plan filing requirements are specified in the guidance (revising Revenue Procedures 2005-16 and 2007-44), including, for example, requirements that amendments adopted by a pre-approved sponsor or practitioner on behalf of adopting employers must be provided to the adopting employers.

Mass submitters, sponsors, practitioners and adopting employers should review Revenue Procedure 2011-49 prior to undertaking opinion or advisory letter submissions or amendments.  

© 2012 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Partner

Todd A. Solomon is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  Todd focuses his practice primarily on designing, amending, and administering pension plans, profit sharing plans, 401(k) plans, employee stock ownership plans, 403(b) plans, and nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements.  He also counsels privately and publicly held corporations and tax-exempt entities regarding fiduciary issues under ERISA, employee benefits issues involved in corporate transactions, executive compensation matters, and the...

312-984-7513

About the Author

Associate

Brett R. Johnson is an associate in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago Office.   He focuses his practice on a variety of employee benefits matters related to pension plans, 401(k) plans, employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs), cafeteria and welfare plans, and executive compensation.  He has advised clients on a wide range of benefit plan matters including mergers and acquisitions, ERISA and tax qualification.  He has dealt with the Internal Revenue Service under various circumstances, including...

312-984-6485

Contributors

Associate Director-Compensation and Benefits Advisory Services

Kay Kemp is an Associate Director-Compensation and Benefits Advisory Services in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm's Chicago office. 

312-984-6881

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.