Advertisement

May 23, 2013

IRS: Value of Facility-Specific Power Purchase Agreement Capitalized into Basis of Wind Facility

On April 6, 2012 the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Private Letter Ruling 201214007, which concluded that where a taxpayer purchased wind energy facilities accompanied by facility-specific Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), no portion of the purchase price need be allocated to the PPAs as a separate asset. Any consideration not allocated to real property could be capitalized into the tax basis of the facilities themselves. The result is very favorable for acquirers of renewable energy facilities seeking to take advantage of accelerated depreciation deductions (MACRS) and the investment tax credit (ITC).

The IRS’s Private Letter Ruling is available here.

In the ruling, the taxpayer was an electrical utility acquiring (at arm’s-length from unrelated parties) a number of existing and under-construction wind energy facilities. Each facility consisted of tangible property including land, wind turbines, towers, pads, on-site power collection systems, monitoring and meteorological equipment, and site improvements. Each facility also came with a facility-specific PPA, i.e., a contract to sell a specified amount of output from that specific wind facility. Neither the facility’s owner, nor any transferee who could theoretically acquire the PPA separately, could fulfill the contract by selling output from any other generation source other than the specified wind facility.

The utility engaged an appraiser to value its purchased assets for financial accounting purposes. Partly because some of the existing PPAs called for above-current-market rates, the appraiser attributed separate value to the PPAs in addition to the value attributed to the facilities’ tangible personal property components.

Nevertheless, for tax purposes, the IRS reasoned that where each PPA could only be fulfilled by a specific facility, the PPAs themselves retained no value separate from their respective specified wind facilities. Therefore, while presumably some portion of the purchase price was allocated to the real property, any remaining consideration could be capitalized into the tax basis of the facilities themselves.

This ruling has obvious and positive implications for acquirers of renewable energy facilities seeking to take advantage of MACRS and the ITC if those facilities are accompanied by facility-specific PPAs. Increasing the tax basis of the energy facilities increases the value of the 30% tax credit available under the ITC (including for wind and other facilities that elect to take the ITC in lieu of the production tax credit). Although the facility’s remaining tax basis is decreased by 15% (i.e., half the amount of the ITC), the increased basis also increases the amount potentially depreciable over an accelerated five-year period under MACRS.

The IRS has previously stated that it will scrutinize the claimed tax basis of renewable energy property where the property is acquired from related parties or is accompanied by a separately valuable PPA. Although the Private Letter ruling cannot be used or cited as precedent, it does demonstrate that the IRS will accept favorable valuations of energy property where such valuations are indeed supported by the facts.

©1994-2013 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Travis practices in the Tax Section in the firm’s Boston office. He primarily advises investors and operating companies in a wide range of high-value business transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, private equity and venture capital investments, fund formations, equity and debt financings, bankruptcy and insolvency issues, and tax credit transactions.

617-348-1684

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.