Advertisement

May 21, 2013

J-1 Cap on Visas for Interns and Trainees

Guess what’s right around the corner in the world of J-1 visas?

The “J-1 Cap.”

If you are an intern or trainee wishing to come to the United States on a J-1 exchange visitor visa, or an employer seeking to assist prospective employees with securing J-1 visas, the window to act is closing soon. The “J-1 Cap” will soon be reached. New visas will not be available until January 2013.

Every year, thousands of professionals, recent university graduates and students from abroad come to the United States under the umbrella of the State Department’s J-1 Intern and Trainee visa programs. These programs offer exchange visitors an opportunity to live and work in the United States for a year to 18 months. Participants in these programs receive a short but meaningful glimpse into America. And they gain practical work experience at American companies. United States employers benefit from hosting J-1 exchange visitors, because they foster a cross-cultural exchange of ideas in the workplace. J-1 exchange visitors also take back to their home countries an appreciation for American business culture. The program is a resounding success.

Despite the benefits of cultural exchange, the State Department has arbitrarily imposed a limit on the number of visas issued to J-1 interns and trainees. This “J-1 Cap” is about to be reached. According to our best information, the private sector program sponsors administering J-1 Trainee and Intern programs will be unable to sponsor more people for visas as of this coming August, or even sooner. Unlike the annual limit on H-1B work visas, which Congress has established through legislation subject to public debate, the State Department created the “J-1 Cap” with no public discussion and without a vote.

Intercultural exchange is an important purpose of the J-1 visa program. In a world that is increasingly global and interconnected, the State Department should be expanding the reach of our business culture. The J-1 visa program for interns and trainees is one way to do this. An arbitrary “J-1 Cap” may be a response to some J-1 sponsors violating State Department rules, or to protectionist concerns about American jobs. But this is not the right response, especially when promoting international commerce is so strongly linked to our national interest.

©1994-2013 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Member

Doug is a Member in the firm's Boston office. He is the Section Manager for the Immigration Practice and also practices in the Israel Business Section. Doug's practice focuses on business immigration law, related government investigations, family-based green card sponsorship processes, EB-5 investor visa filings, and corporate immigration policy development. 

617-348-3044

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.