Advertisement

June 19, 2013

Massachusetts Legislature Makes Major Changes to the Gift Ban Law

My colleagues from ML StrategiesGeorge Atanasov and Julie Cox, published a client alert discussing changes to the Massachusetts Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Manufacturer Code of Conduct.  The text of the alert is included below:

The Massachusetts Legislature today voted 147-3 to pass the FY2013 budget conference report which includes sections that will alter key provisions of M.G.L. Chapter 111N, the state’s so-called Gift Ban Law. After weeks of deliberations, the six-member legislative conference committee filed the compromise budget last night. The final product addresses differences between the initial House and Senate budget proposals in which the House attempted to repeal entire sections of the Gift Ban Law and the Senate opted not to address the issue.

The compromise language amends Section 2 of the Gift Ban Law in several ways, including:

  • Permitting the payment of reasonable expenses necessary for technical training on the use of a medical device without a requirement for a pre-existing vendor purchase contract
  • Allowing for the payment of “modest meals and refreshments” for non-CME educational presentations that are designed to educate health care practitioners about the benefits, risks and appropriate uses of prescription drugs or medical devices
  • Charging the Department of Public Health (DPH) with the responsibility to promulgate regulations that define “modest meals and refreshments” and
  • Relieving pharmaceutical and medical device companies from disclosing certain information to the DPH where the companies have already done so pursuant to federal law

The new provisions would take effect upon Governor Deval Patrick’s signature.

©1994-2013 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Brian is an Associate in Mintz Levin’s Litigation and Health Law Sections, and is part of the firm’s Health Care Enforcement Defense Group. Brian has handled a wide range of litigation and health care matters involving litigation, investigations, and voluntary disclosures. He has defended clients against allegations of false claims, whistleblower claims, and in SEC investigations and enforcement proceedings. He has also represented clients in complex business disputes.

617-348-1810

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.