May 24, 2012

Michelle’s Law Compliance Date Looming

Dinsmore & Shohl

A new statute enacted October 9, 2008 which is effective for plan years beginning one year after the date of enactment (for example, January 1, 2010 for a calendar year plan) must allow certain dependents who otherwise would lose coverage to remain covered under the plan for up to an additional year. See Code § 9813 and ERISA § 714. This new law adds to the growing list of group health plan notices and potential extended coverage situations.

This statutory provision was named after Michelle Morse, who was a 20 year old full time student at Plymouth State University when she was diagnosed with colon cancer in December 2003. She declined medical advice to take a medical leave of absence from school because she did not want to lose coverage as a dependent under her mother’s plan since she would then no longer be a full time student. The family could not afford the increase in premiums for COBRA coverage. Ms. Morse’s plight inspired a state law in New Hampshire and then inspired the federal law.

Under the new law, a dependent child who is covered under a group health plan by reason of being a full time student in a post-secondary educational institution will be allowed to take a medically necessary leave of absence due to an illness or injury and remain covered under the plan until the earlier of one year after the leave of absence begins or the date coverage would otherwise terminate under the terms of the plan. A prerequisite to maintaining continued coverage is the plan’s receipt of a medical certification from the covered dependent student’s treating physician. Any notice sent to full time students asking them to certify their student status must also contain a description of the terms of continued coverage during a medically necessary leave of absence.

Action Items
 

  1. Amend your plans and summary plan descriptions to comply with Michelle's Law. The plan should be amended by the date Michelle's Law applies. ERISA allows notice of a material modification to be distributed within 210 days after the end of the plan year to which the material modification applies. This can be distributed as a summary of material modifications to the summary plan description.

     

  2. Notwithstanding the maximum period allowed for distributing a summary of material modifications, consider notifying employees before or shortly after the effective date so that covered students who incur a medically necessary leave of absence from student status have notice of how to exercise their rights. Such notification is good for employee relations and could prevent a claim of fiduciary breach for failing to notify participants and beneficiaries of their ability to continue coverage under Michelle's Law.

     

  3. Coordinate with your third party administrator or insurer to make sure that certifications of student status include a description of how to continue plan coverage during a medically necessary leave of absence from full time student status.

     

  4. Adopt plan procedures to facilitate implementation of Michelle's Law.
© 2009 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.