Advertisement

June 18, 2013

New Global Initiatives to Accelerate Examination of Cleantech Patent Applications

In an effort to promote the development and commercialization of technologies that conserve natural resources or reduce negative environmental impact, patent offices around the world have adopted programs to expedite the examination of patent applications pertaining to clean technologies. 

AUSTRALIA

On September 15, 2009, IP Australia announced a fast-track examination program for patent applications directed to environmentally friendly technologies.  Examination of applications under the program is expected to begin within four to eight weeks after filing the request for expedited examination and no additional fee is required.

BRAZIL

The National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) launched a program on April 17, 2012 to accelerate the patenting of green technologies in alternative energy, transportation, energy conservation, waste management, and agriculture.  The goal of the program is to reduce the average prosecution time of an application from over five years to less than two years.  The program is limited to the first 500 petitions granted and to applications originally filed on or after January 2, 2011 in the INPI or filed as a Paris Convention application in the INPI within one year of a priority application.

CANADA

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office issued an initiative on March 3, 2011 to accelerate the examination of patent applications pertaining to green technology.  Under the initiative, a patent applicant can request accelerated examination by submitting a declaration stating that the application relates to a technology that could help to resolve or mitigate environmental impacts or conserve the natural environment and resources if commercialized, with no additional fee required.

CHINA

Effective August 1, 2012, prioritized examination of applications relating to energy conservation, environmental protection, or green technologies will be available in China.  Applicants must submit a search report by a qualified entity or a translation of a search report issued by another country. Once a request for prioritized examination is granted, a first office action is expected to issue within 30 days and prioritized examination is expected to be completed within one year.

ISRAEL

A new category of applications that could receive priority examination was created for “green patents” by the Israel Patent Office on December 27, 2009.  To request priority examination, the applicant must provide an explanation as to why the invention helps advance environmental protection; however, the declaration and extra fees normally required for priority examination are not required. After qualifying under the program, these “green” patent applications will be examined within three months.

JAPAN

On November 1, 2009, the Japanese Patent Office implemented a program allowing for the accelerated examination of “green inventions” having a beneficial effect on the environment through low energy consumption or reduction of carbon dioxide emissions. Under the program, an applicant can receive a first office action in about two months.

SOUTH KOREA

The Korean Intellectual Property Office launched a fast-track examination program on October 1, 2009 for patent applications related to certain categories of green technologies.  Under this program, an applicant must submit results of a prior art search along with a request for fast-track examination, and a first office action will be issued within one month of the request.

UNITED KINGDOM

On May 12, 2009, the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office created a “Green Channel” program whereby an applicant can request accelerated processing of an application by indicating (1) that the invention relates to a “green” or environmentally friendly technology, and (2) which actions the applicant wishes to accelerate (i.e., search, combined search and examination, publication, and/ or examination).  The program applies to existing applications and applications filed after May 12, 2009.  A searchable public database of published applications in the Green Channel program is available.  As of August 3, 2012, the database contains over 500 applications.

UNITED STATES

The Green Technology Pilot Program for expediting examination of clean technology applications closed earlier this year, with over 1,050 patents issued under the program.  However, other accelerated examination options applicable to all technologies are still available for clean technology applications. These options include the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) Prioritized Examination Program (Track I), the Patent Prosecution Highway, the Accelerated Examination Program, and a Petition based on Applicant’s Age or Health.  Under the Track I program, an application is advanced out of turn for examination upon payment of a $4,800 petition fee, reduced by 50% for qualifying small entity applicants. The USPTO’s goal is to provide a final disposition of a Track I application within 12 months of prioritized status being granted. A maximum of 10,000 requests will be granted  under Track I per fiscal year, and approximately 3,000 have been granted so far in fiscal year 2012.  The average pendency of a Track I application from the grant of a Track I request to the issuance of a first office action on the merits is approximately 1.5 months, and the average pendency from the grant of a Track I request to a final disposition of the application is approximately 5 months. 

In view of the numerous international opportunities for accelerated examination and the growing importance of clean technologies, patent applicants should carefully consider these expedited options as part of a global IP strategy to patent their environmental innovations and bring them quickly to market. 

© 2013 Sterne Kessler

About the Author

Director

Mr. Jackman is a director in the Biotechnology/Chemical Group.  His  practice includes counseling clients in areas such as global patent portfolio procurement and management strategies, FDA/ANDA practice, technology transfer, invalidity, noninfringement, freedom-to-operate and patentability opinions and due diligence investigations.  He has also written and prosecuted patent applications domestically and internationally in areas such as immunology, genomics, molecular and cell biology, recombinant DNA technology, transgenics, bioprocessing, advanced biofuels...

202.772.8582

About the Author

Associate

Dr. Brandes is an associate in the firm's Biotechnology/Chemical Group where she counsels domestic and international clients on the preparation, prosecution, and management of complex worldwide patent portfolios. She is also experienced in technology transfer, invalidity, noninfringement, freedom-to-operate and patentability opinions, and due diligence investigations.  Specifically, she works with clients to obtain and enforce patents in areas such as biotechnology, immunology, biofuels, pharmaceutical formulations, and food science....

202-772-8836

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.