May 24, 2012

New HSR Rules for Premerger Notification Filings - Effective August 18

Effective August 18, 2011, new rules apply to premerger notification filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “Act”). The new rules will require the submission of additional documents under a new Item 4(d), the reporting of additional revenues under Item 5, and the disclosure of associated entities and related information under Item 6. The HSR form will also be amended to reflect these new rules.

The new Item 4(d) expands on the concepts behind the existing, and still effective, Item 4(c). New Item 4(d) is broader than 4(c), however, and will require the filing of Confidential Information Memorandum (CIM), or equivalent documents, prepared within one year of filing of the HSR form, regardless of whether the CIM specifically addresses the transaction to be reviewed. Item 4(d) will also require submission of pitch books (even those prepared prior to engagement by the parties to the reported transaction) and other analyses compiled by third parties such as investment bankers and consultants. Item 4(d) will also require the submission of synergies analyses relating to the reported transaction.

Item 5 of the HSR form has been expanded to require the disclosure of revenues for foreign manufactured products that are sold in the US either at wholesale or retail, or which are direct shipped to US customers. Previously, foreign manufactured products sold in or into the US only had to be disclosed under the 6 digit NAICS codes if the goods were sold through related US operations. Parties will have to organize and group the revenues according to the cumbersome 10-digit NAICS codes.

Item 6 has also been expanded to capture information on “associated” entities. Previously, in transactions involving private equity funds or hedge funds, for example, acquiring funds need not have produced information about related funds in the same industry even if the funds were managed by the same general partner or were under some other common management structure because the general partner or manager did not have “control” of all of the funds. Now, acquiring entities that have minority interests in funds that are in the same line of business with the acquired entity will have to disclose the minority interests and management interests in these other entities.

While the HSR amendments have been touted as ways to streamline the HSR notification process, in practical effect they will increase the burden on the parties involved in reportable transactions, which necessarily will increase the filing costs.

©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

Andrew G. Berg is a Shareholder in the firm's Litigation Practice Group. He advises clients on litigation, mergers and acquisitions, and other antitrust and competition-related matters before the Federal Trade Commission, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, state attorneys general, and in private litigation. Mr. Berg's practice also includes a full range of antitrust transactional and mergers- and acquisitions-related experience including "Hart-Scott-Rodino" filings at the FTC and DOJ and related merger analysis issues. He also counsels and...

202.331.3181

About the Author

Shareholder

Greg Casas focuses his practice in antitrust, complex business litigation, and energy and natural resources law. Greg's antitrust practice is international in scope and includes litigating price-fixing, bid-rigging, market allocation claims and providing counseling for DOJ/FTC investigations, joint venture formation, mergers and acquisitions, pricing plans and other contractual relationships. His complex business litigation experience includes international dispute resolution and arbitration and class action litigation. Greg's energy experience includes litigating power plant...

512.320.7238

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.