Ninth Circuit: Spousal Consent Not Required Under Top-Hat Plans
Friday, February 27, 2015

The Ninth Circuit held that a participant’s brother, rather than his spouse, was the proper beneficiary of benefits under a profit sharing plan.  In so holding, the Court found that:  (a) the participant’s first wife, who was designated as the primary beneficiary, had waived her rights to benefits as part of the couple’s divorce; and (b) the participant’s second wife had no rights to the benefits, since she was not a named beneficiary and top-hat plans are exempt from ERISA’s spousal consent requirements.  The case is E & J Gallo Winery v. Rogers, 2015 WL 738265 (9th Cir. Feb. 23, 2015) (unpublished).

 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins