Advertisement

May 22, 2013

NLRB Settlement Sets Precedent for E-Verify Compliance Among Unionized Workforces

A recent settlement between the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Pacific Steel Casting Company (PSC), based in Berkeley, California, set a new standard for E-Verify compliance in the unionized labor arena.

The steps for the precedent-making settlement were set in motion when ICE conducted a Form I-9 audit for approximately 550 PSC employees in February 2011. At this time, PSC voluntarily enrolled in E-Verify without notifying its unionized employees or their union chapter, Local 164B. When Local 164B subsequently learned of the enrollment, the company contended that it was required to participate in E-Verify because of its role as a federal contractor. When this claim was found to be incorrect, the union filed a complaint with the NLRB alleging that PSC’s lack of bargaining over its E-Verify enrollment changed the terms and conditions of employment and amounted to a unilateral repudiation and/or modification of its contracts with unionized workers.

Under the terms of the settlement, PSC agreed to withdraw from E-Verify and to reinstate and award back pay and lost benefits to all employees who were erroneously terminated while contesting Tentative Non-Confirmations (TNCs), as well as workers who were denied the opportunity to contest TNCs at all. Under the rules governing E-Verify, an employee who wishes to contest a TNC must be afforded an opportunity to do so within ten federal government workdays and may not be terminated unless and until he/she receives a Final Non-Confirmation (FNC) or a “SSA/DHS No Show.”

The settlement breaks new ground for alerting employers with unionized employees to their bargaining and other union contract obligations when considering voluntary enrollment in E-Verify. Before making the decision to enroll, companies should carefully review their collective bargaining agreements, notify union and affected employees as required, and properly train human resources personnel on E-Verify rules to prevent unlawful terminations.

©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Nataliya Binshteyn focuses her practice on global business immigration matters. Her experience includes representing political asylum applicants in immigration proceedings before Asylum Officers and Immigration Judges. Nataliya has experience conducting client interviews, researching country conditions and applicable laws, and soliciting expert testimony as well as drafting affidavits and immigration documents for filing with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

703-903-7583

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.