May 24, 2012

No Longer an Option: Social Media Policies Are Necessary for Law Firms

As social media’s seemingly unabated growth continues, many more law firms have embraced this emerging technology.  It’s difficult to resist the powerful business to business potential of social media and networking sites because these tools allow firms to connect directly with their core constituencies (clients, prospects, employees, etc) and create valuable communities.  Yet, as a number of recent developments showcase, these tools also present a variety of challenges for law firms.  For example, a widely discussed National Law Journal article that was published on May 31st revealed that new community pages on Facebook can prove embarrassing for law firms.  Which firms would ever advertise that they have “bimbos,” “ticklemasters,” or “whipping boys” working for them?  Even though these pages seem fake, they can still bring some level of embarrassment to a firm.  This is especially true when these pages are generated from the profiles of Facebook users.  Thus, there is in fact a Facebook user who claims to work at a law firm and who has included his or job title as “whipping boy.” 

This example is not even the most frightening for law firms (or any professional organization).  Just ask James Andrews, formerly of large PR firm Ketchum, Inc.  While in Memphis visiting FedEx, a major client, Andrews said via Twitter that he would die if he had to live there.  This comment was not well received by Memphis-based FedEx and created a great deal of embarrassment for Ketchum.  These types of off-handed and seemingly harmless remarks are constantly posted on Twitter, Facebook, blogs, and other social media sites. Given the explosion and increasing importance of social media, it has become necessary and paramount that law firms establish and enforce social media policies for attorneys and staff members.          

Perhaps the first and most important step in creating a social media policy is defining the ubiquitous term.  I define social media as any digital platform that facilitates interactivity and connectivity.  Depending on a firm’s use of social media, this definition may vary slightly, but the social media policy should be as broad as possible so it anticipates potential social media sites.  In order to protect a firm, these policies should address: email usage; blog posts and commentary; social networking access; online professional profiles; social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Legal OnRamp, etc); privacy expectations; disclosure; confidentiality; security; and violations.  Once finalized, all firm attorneys and staff should read and sign this policy to ensure their awareness of the rules.  The firm could also produce a one-page laminated tip sheet that summarizes the policy or highlights the most important rules.  Having a physical reminder on someone’s desk or near a computer offers further assurances that the policy will be followed (alternatively, this tip sheet could be posted on the homepage of the firm’s intranet).      

Law firms cannot ignore social media, but must establish clear and robust policies to protect the firm and its reputation.  In the social media sphere, reputation is the most valuable commodity an organization posses.  Lose your that respect and trust and it can be difficult – even impossible – to regain.

 

Originally published in the Summer 2010 issue of LMA Practice Marketing Newsletter Copyright 2010 Legal Marketing Association –The Virginias Chapter. 

© 2012 Hellerman Baretz Communications LLC

About the Author

Senior Account Executive

Andrew K. Ryan is a senior account executive at Hellerman Baretz Communications.  He is based in Richmond, VA.  Andrew develops strategic public relations campaigns for the world’s most prominent law, accounting and consulting firms.  Andrew’s breadth of experience and multi-disciplinary approach to PR combined with his detail-oriented nature and persuasive ability allows him to deliver outstanding results. 

804-273-9477

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.