Advertisement

May 18, 2013

North Carolina Chicken Farm Fights NPDES Permit for Air Emissions

In a novel approach to water quality regulation, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) has required a large chicken farm to obtain a Clean Water Act NPDES permit in an attempt to regulate air emissions of ammonia and other pollutants from the farm. Should the state succeed in its argument that water quality impacts of air emissions can be regulated under NPDES permits, it would potentially open a wide variety of sources (some regulated and some unregulated under the Clean Air Act) to new regulation under the Clean Water Act – whether or not they are direct dischargers.

The farm holds an NPDES permit from 2004 that prohibits discharges to water. No discharge to water has ever occurred. No air permit is required for the facility, based on a determination that emissions are below federal thresholds. Nevertheless, in 2010 the state added several best management practices (BMPs) to the NPDES permit to address airborne ammonia emissions from the facility that were thought to be impacting local waters.

The farm initially challenged the BMPs before an administrative law judge, who sided with the farm. However, the administrative law judge's holding was overturned by the state's administrative board of appeals. The farm has now filed in the state Superior Court a Petition for Review of the decision and order by the state administrative appeals board. While this is a local skirmish at the moment, it has the potential for significant impacts nationally if the state succeeds in court. 

© 2013 Varnum LLP

About the Author

Partner

Tim Lundgren is a partner in the Environmental Practice Group and chair of the firm's Water Law Specialty Area. Tim works on matters related to water quality and water supply and use, including discharge permitting and compliance, stormwater compliance, and water withdrawal. He has assisted clients with waterfront and port facilities on permitting and compliance matters both on inland waterways and on the Great Lakes, and with spill...

616/336-6750

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.