Advertisement

May 21, 2013

NYSE Commission: Boards’ Focus Should be Long-term

Risk Management - RIMS

Following the financial crisis, the New York Stock Exchange’s Commission on Corporate Governance has found that corporate boards should focus more on long-term growth, instead of short-term gains.

The yearlong examination also found that managers should be more involved in corporate governance and boards should not rely too heavily on legislation and agency rule-making in establishing corporate governance strategies.

“We think this is really important today because, more than ever before, boards are confronted with pressure to act to increase shareholder prices in the short-term — including facing pressure to take actions that may lead to a short-term increase in shareholder value at the expense of long-term, sustainable growth.”

The panel, chaired by Larry Sonsini, chairman of law firm Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, recommended the following 10 core principals to improve corporate governance and the proxy voting process:

  1. The board’s fundamental objective should be to build long -term sustainable growth in shareholder value for the corporation, and the board is accountable to shareholders for its performance in achieving this objective.
     
  2. While the board’s responsibility for corporate governance has long been established, the critical role of management in establishing proper corporate governance has not been sufficiently recognized. The Commission believes that a key aspect of successful governance depends upon successful management of the company, as management has primary responsibility for creating an environment in which a culture of performance with integrity can flourish.
     
  3. Shareholders have the right, a responsibility and a long- term economic interest to vote their shares in a thoughtful manner, in recognition of the fact that voting decisions influence director behavior, corporate governance and conduct, and that voting decisions are one of the primary means of communicating with companies on issues of concern.
     
  4. Good corporate governance should be integrated with the company’s business strategy and objectives and should not be viewed simply as a compliance obligation separate from the company’s long- term business prospects.
     
  5. Legislation and agency rule -making are important to establish the basic tenets of corporate governance and ensure the efficiency of our markets. Beyond these fundamental principles, however, the Commission has a preference for market -based governance solutions whenever possible.
     
  6. Good corporate governance includes transparency for corporations and investors, sound disclosure policies and communication beyond disclosure through dialogue and engagement as necessary and appropriate.
     
  7. While independence and objectivity are necessary attributes of board members, companies must also strike the right balance between the appointment of independent and non independent directors to ensure that there is an appropriate range and mix of expertise, diversity and knowledge on the board.
     
  8. The Commission recognizes the influence that proxy advisory firms have on the market, and believes that such firms should be held to appropriate standards of transparency and accountability. The Commission commends the SEC for its issuance of the Concept Release on the U.S. Proxy System, which includes inviting comments on how such firms should be regulated.
     
  9. The SEC should work with the NYSE and other exchanges to ease the burden of proxy voting and communication while encouraging greater participation by individual investors in the proxy voting process.
     
  10. The SEC and/or the NYSE should consider a wide range of views to determine the impact of major corporate governance reforms on corporate performance over the last decade. The SEC and/or the NYSE should also periodically assess the impact of major corporate governance reforms on the promotion of sustainable, long- term corporate growth and sustained profitability.

Sonsini stressed that the commission can only recommend these principles. The success of them depends on a company’s willingness to implement and maintain such initiatives.

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2010 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Editor

Emily Holbrook is the editor of Risk Management magazine and the Risk Management Monitor blog.

212-655-5915

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.