April 23, 2014

Purl Two Together: Clothing Store Mounts Erotic Yarn Advertising Display

Growing up in suburban New York, 20 miles north of The Bronx, an annual trip into Manhattan to see Rockefeller Center and the dressed windows of Macy's and Saks Fifth Avenue means that whatever we tell you, all New Yorkers, themselves, are tourists.  Don't let us condescend otherwise.  

But that's not why we're here.  If you're not familiar, or if you haven't seen Estelle Getty's "Mannequin", each Christmas Season the windows of Saks, Bergdorf Goodman, Barney's and Macy's areturned  into storybook vignettes reminiscent of something you'd see in Hill Valley circa 1955.  It's still done, and it's still glorious.

This is the age, however, of the numbed consumer.  We skip commercials through nimble DVR work, we "X" out of ads on web sites and we, generally, need more to keep us engaged than simple, throwback window-dressing, right?  

Turns out that Benetton is up to the task, with an approach of blending traditional advertising display with what's necessary to awe today's saturated and perpetually unimpressed consumer.  In a newly installed advertising campaign in its New York store, in a sort of Christo-meets-Anthony-Christian manner, Benetton features two yarn-covered "people" having sex.  I have no idea why they chose green and orange, but, now that I see it, I simply cannot imagine any other colors. 


While this is New York -- and, what's more, it is "South of Houston" New York -- might we see similar things in other urban areas in time to come?  I bet we will.  Heck, there's a Benetton store in Raleigh's Crabtree Valley Mall, which is where I buy my yarn beer and yarn cigarettes.  And if we will see similar displays in other areas, what can we expect in terms of public response or attempted private or governmental regulation?

So, let's bring this back to our core thought: land use.  Can this type of display be regulated if it's within a store?  If so, can it be regulated by lease? By local ordinance?  Both?  Is the existence of this display enough to turn a "retail store" under a local zoning ordinance into an "adult store", for example, under the same local ordinance?  Does the paradigm change if Benetton places the yarn-ography in the store window for display rather than within complete confines of the store?  

This raises some interesting land use issues, to be sure.

Copyright © 2014 Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Michael C Thelen, Womble Carlyle Firm, Litigation Attorney

Mike represents myriad clients – from Fortune 500® companies to smaller, privately-owned organizations – in cross sections of business throughout the many stages of federal and state litigation.  From his years of practice in New York and North Carolina, Mike primarily has experience in the areas of land use, local/municipal government law and real estate litigation, having handled zoning, development agreement, land use planning, eminent domain and condemnation, construction, retail and commercial landlord-tenant, partnership dissolution, state law torts, and civil...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you wo