May 24, 2012

Putting Cloud Data Storage Providers to the Test

Risk Management - RIMS

There are well-publicized cost advantages for businesses that move data storage to the cloud. But even when a firm outsources these tasks to a cloud storage provider, it is still that company's responsibility to ensure security and regulatory compliance. 

For this reason, it is important to evaluate the security practices of any provider before you make a choice. Paramount to that are three areas: security, customer support and corporate integrity.

Security

First and foremost, providers must adhere to stringent industry security standards to meet client expectations, regulatory requirements and industry best practices. There needs to be a concerted focus on application, data, infrastructure, product development, personnel and process security. Most reputable suppliers will restrict employee access to information-and control what employees can do with the information that they can access.

Furthermore, financial security regulations require more than technology -- they require a complete life cycle approach. Providers should offer comprehensive training and continue to audit performance. The best providers understand that security can only be maintained through constant monitoring. They pay close attention to both current trends and potential threats on the horizon. These providers will recognize various types of threats and take swift, decisive steps to limit exposures. Proactive security greatly reduces the risk that confidential information may leak and cause damage to a firm's reputation. 

Top-tier cloud storage vendors will also be able to explain how they use multiple layers of security to protect sensitive data and assets. With so much private client information in the data (such as social security numbers, bank account numbers and employment records), a layered approach to security is critical -- but it is something that most web hosting or internally hosted sites do not provide. 

Customer Service

Just as their applications are available around-the-clock, sound service providers are as well. Support and assistance to help users deal with software and services should be available 24/7/365, and they should provide zero-hour responses to any security threats or concerns of the client. The best cloud storage companies operate support and incident response teams at all times-something that will be particularly vital given the limited IT resources that companies that store their data on the cloud typically have at their disposal.

Integrity

When comparing cloud storage providers, it is essential to determine their ability to deliver on their promises by holding discussions with existing customers, accessing the public record and inspecting audit and incident reports. 

Another indicator of a secure implementation is an independent audit such as a SAS 70 Type II certification. In the financial sector, most prime brokers, fund administrators and even a few funds are going through this process to reassure investors that they have the proper security procedures in place. Any fund or a fund administrator that is SAS 70 Type II certified should ensure that their service provider of choice has met the same standards.

____________

Paul Diblasi is vice president of product marketing at IntraLinks, a provider of SaaS solutions.

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2012 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Risk Management Magazine  is the premier source of analysis, insight and news for corporate risk managers. RM strives to explore existing and emerging techniques and concepts that address the needs of those who are tasked with protecting the physical, financial, human and intellectual assets of their companies. As the business world and the world at large change with increasing speed, RM keeps its readers informed about new challenges and solutions....

212-286-9364

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.