May 24, 2012

REALITY BITES - Brand Protection, Reality TV Style

THE SITUATION IS ASKED NOT TO COVER HIS SITUATION WITH ABERCROMBIE ANYMORE


Abercrombie & Fitch issued a press release offering The Situation (of MTV's The Jersey Shore fame) "substantial payment" to stop wearing Abercrombie's clothes. The company's main concern is brand dilution. The press release explains the company is worried that The Situation's "association with our brand could cause significant damage to our image" and that this association "is contrary to the aspirational nature of our brand, and may be distressing to many of our fans." Whether this was a clever public relations strategy to generate publicity about the brand during the important back-to-school season or whether it is a legitimate branding issue that had something to do with the dip in Abercrombie's stock following the press release remains unclear. What is clear, however, is that people are talking about it. Common wisdom is there may be no such thing as bad publicity; however, it cannot be ignored that Abercrombie's stock fell sharply the day following the press release.

THE KARDASHIAN – SEARS MARRIAGE CAUSES THE GIRLS TO END UP IN COURT

Kim Kardashian filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Old Navy for using a model/actress that allegedly looks like her and calls her to mind in its commercials.  Some speculate that the reason Kim filed the suit was to protect her apparel licensing deal with Sears because Old Navy's lookalike campaign could allegedly harm Sears' Kardashian Kollection campaign, which hadn't yet launched at the time she filed suit. Others speculate that the real reason is because the lookalike model/actress is now dating Kim's ex-boyfriend and football player, Reggie Bush. Either way, it will be interesting to see whether Kim can prevail in her claims for unfair competition under the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125-a), and violations of the common law and statutory rights of publicity.

Soon after the Kardashian Kollection debuted at Sears, handbag designer Monica Botiker sent a cease and desist letter to the company, alleging a faux leather handbag from Sears' Kardashian Kollection resembles one of her bags. Sears promptly pulled the Kardashian bag from its website. Given the Kardashian's fiercely protective stance over their brand (which is entirely appropriate and smart), it is interesting to see them on the other side of the fight. If a fashion company wants to be taken seriously when it wields the trademark laws as a sword, it should take care not to unfairly encroach on and have respect for others' rights.

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Sheppard Mullin’s Fashion and Apparel team has firsthand experience working with companies that produce everything from hi-tech synthetic yarns to high fashion, fabrics to footwear, and bricks to clicks.

Fashion is a nearly $500 billion retail industry. It comprises a wide variety of skills and industry sectors, from fashion designers to contract manufacturers, from textile manufacturing to distributors, from financiers to factors. In addition, the major retail chains have a serious influence on the apparel and fashion business. Technology and global markets have rapidly...

212-332-3602

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.