May 24, 2012

Reforming Post-Crisis Risk Management

Risk Management

There were 88 banking crises over the last 40 years, according to the International Monetary Fund. Given this, the challenge of managing risk within the financial industry has proven to be a monumental task. 

So what can the financial services industry do to better monitor, manage and maintain the resilience of a financial system that is just now beginning to recover from its worst shock since the Great Depression? The World Economic Forum's latest report, "Rethinking Risk Management in Financial Services: Practices from Other Domains," aims to answer such a question. And it does so by analyzing the risk management strategies of seven unexpected domains well outside of the financial services sector: aviation, fisheries, immunology, infectious disease control, pharmaceuticals, telecommunications and wildfire fighting.

In looking at these diverse industries, the report makes nine proposals. By examining immunology, the WEF suggests that financial firms should "innovate transparently," meaning firms and regulators should be weary of rapidly "mutating" products and carefully monitor those instruments with the possibility of exceptional growth and variation. Looking at the aviation industry's constant efforts towards improving safety by gathering and analyzing data on all accidents and near misses, the WEF suggests those in financial services could do the same by identifying any indications of threats to the system, analyzing the information and acting accordingly. And by examining the World Health Organization and its approach to pandemic prediction, the Forum suggests that financial services could create similar early-warning tools and indicators, helping the industry become more proactive instead of reactive. 

"Drawing inspiration from unusual quarters, the report makes a compelling argument for finance to break from its somewhat insular approach to risk management," said Duncan Martin, partner and managing director at The Boston Consulting Group. Though the Forum states that its report is merely food for thought, it is obvious that the financial services industry could benefit from the ways in which other industries handle risk. Many hope that the report will, at the very least, initiate a constructive dialogue between those in the industry with the aim of making the financial services field as a whole more resilient and risk-aware.

The above article is reprinted from the July 2010 on-line edition of Risk Management Magazine.

Reprinted with permission from Risk Management Magazine. Copyright 2010 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Editor

Emily Holbrook is the editor of Risk Management magazine and the Risk Management Monitor blog.

212-655-5915

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.