February 22, 2012

Removing the Ban on General Solicitations Gaining Momentum

Privately held small businesses may soon face one less obstacle when it comes to finding potential sources of capital. Currently, capital raising efforts for these businesses, and anyone acting on their behalf, are constrained by a prohibition under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) on general solicitation and general advertising for all private offerings. But in recent months, the House of Representatives and a new advisory committee to the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) have proposed that for most private offerings this prohibition should no longer apply. A removal of such general solicitation restrictions would clearly facilitate the raising of early-stage capital “on-line.”

In early November of 2011, the House passed the Access to Capital for Job Creators Act (H.R. 2940) by a large and bi-partisan majority of 413-11. If the bill becomes law, the SEC would be required within 90 days to revise Rule 506 of Regulation D to permit general solicitation and general advertising for a private offering, as long as all purchasers are accredited investors. Rule 506, which contains no limits on offering size, is the most widely relied upon rule used for private offerings that are exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. Immediately after H.R. 2940 passed, an identical version (S. 1831) was introduced in the Senate by Senator John Thune, but has not been voted upon yet.

The SEC established the new Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies (ACSEC) in September 2011 to provide advice regarding the SEC’s rules, regulations, and policies; and, on January 6 of this year, the ACSEC made its first recommendation: that the SEC immediately relax or modify its restrictions to permit general solicitation and general advertising in private offerings under Rule 506 in which all purchasers are accredited investors. The ACSEC went so far as to state that the investor protections afforded by the existing restrictions on general solicitation and general advertising are not necessary in private offerings involving only accredited investors.

Considering the legislative support of the House and the priority of the recommendation by the ACSEC, we may see a change allowing general solicitation and general advertising for certain private offerings sometime this year (although this being a presidential election year, this potential change may be stuck in limbo until after the election). The SEC could remove the prohibition if it were to follow the recommendation of its own ACSEC, or such a change could be mandated by the Access to Capital for Job Creators Act if signed into law by the president. We will continue to provide timely updates as developments occur.

©1994-2012 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Member

Daniel is a Member in the Corporate & Securities Section in the New York office and Co-chair of the Venture Capital & Emerging Companies Practice Group. He is also a Member of the Sports & Entertainment Practice Group. Daniel brings a unique blend of talent and expertise to our venture capital and emerging companies practice. In addition to his active legal practice, he is an Adjunct Professor of Law at the NYU Law School and he has a wealth of experience as an active venture capital investor, having co-founded Dawntreader Ventures, an early stage venture...

(212) 692-6223

About the Author

Associate

Sam is an Associate in the Corporate & Securities Section and is part of the Venture Capital and Securities Practice Groups. His practice focuses on general corporate representation, securities law matters, and transactional work, including public and private offerings, mergers and acquisitions, venture capital financings, debt and venture capital fund formation, federal securities law compliance and reporting, and corporate governance matters. 

(212) 692-6810

Contributors

Associate

Garrett is an Associate in the Corporate & Securities Section in the firm's New York office.

(212) 692-6815

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.