Advertisement

April 22, 2014

Revisions to The European Union’s Trade Defence Instruments

The European Commission has published legislative proposals that would make EU anti-dumping and anti-subsidy instruments more efficient and better adapted to shield EU producers from unfair practices.  Specifically, the changes would also protect producers from any risk of retaliation by exporters or exporting countries.


On 10 April 2013, the European Commission released draft proposals for amendments to the Basic Anti-Dumping and Anti-Subsidy Regulations (Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and Regulation (EC) 597/2009 respectively).  The legislative proposals must be approved by the Council and the European Parliament, and could then become law in 2014.   

The proposals aim to make the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy instruments more efficient and better adapted to shield EU producers from unfair practices.  Specifically, the changes would protect producers from any risk of retaliation that might prevent them from exercising their rights. 

The legislative proposals include the following main innovations:

  • Businesses will be informed about any provisional anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures two weeks before the duties are imposed.  Similarly, if it is decided not to impose provisional measures but to instead continue the investigation, interested parties will be informed of this two weeks in advance.  Interested parties will have the opportunity to comment on the calculation of the dumping and injury margins.  The purpose of this change is to improve predictability.

  • Importers will be able to obtain a reimbursement of duties collected during an expiry review if the Commission concludes, as a result of that review, that there is no need to maintain the relevant trade defence measures.

  • The “special circumstances” under which the Commission may initiate investigations itself (ex officio) will be enlarged to include cases where there is a likely threat of retaliation by the exporters or exporting countries.  This proposal would also impose obligations on EU producers to provide the necessary information in order for the ex officio investigation to proceed.

  • It is proposed not to apply the “lesser duty” rule in cases of circumvention of duties, or in cases where the exporting country uses unfair subsidies or creates structured distortions in its raw material markets.

  • A number of practices resulting from European Court of Justice judgments or World Trade Organisation rulings will be codified. 

In addition, the Commission has outlined certain non-legislative proposals that would

  • Facilitate cooperation with firms and trade associations involved in investigations by extending certain deadlines during the investigation

  • Improve monitoring of trade flows

  • Allow ex-officio anti-circumvention investigations against illegal evasion of measures.

The Directorate General for Trade is also working on Guidelines for four particularly complex areas: expiry reviews, the EU interest test, calculation of the injury margin and the choice of an analogue country in investigations against non-market economy countries.

The draft Guidelines will be open to consultation for three months.  Interested parties are encouraged to submit their views. 

Aiste Slezeviciute, a trainee solicitor in the Brussels office, also contributed to this article.

© 2014 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Philip Bentley, QC, McDermott WIll Emery law Firm, Antitrust Attorney
Partner

Philip Bentley is a partner in the international law firm of McDermott Will & Emery/Stanbrook LLP based in its Brussels office.  He is a member of the Firm’s EU regulatory practice and European Competition and Trade Groups.  His practice focuses on EU anti-dumping, trade defense and customs, EU competition (including State aid and public procurement), EU regulatory matters, notably GMOs, and EU litigation.

32 2 282 35 27

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.