Advertisement

May 24, 2013

SEC Stays New Proxy Access Rules

On October 4, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission exercised its discretion to grant a stay of its controversial new proxy access rules and related amendments that were scheduled to take effect on November 15, 2010. As we previously blogged (see our posts here and here), the SEC’s disputed proxy access rules would grant shareholders who have held three percent (3%) of the outstanding stock of a company for at least three (3) years the right to include a limited number of director nominees in the company's proxy statement. For many companies, the stay could effectively delay implementation of the new proxy access rules for the upcoming 2011 proxy season. The order granting the stay can be found  here.

 Background

As we previously blogged (see blog post here), on September 29, 2010, Business Roundtable and the Chamber of Commerce of the United States filed a Petition for Review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit challenging the legality of the SEC's new proxy access rules.  In connection with the Petition for Review, Business Roundtable and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed with the SEC a motion to stay the effect of newly adopted Rule 14a-11 and associated amendments pending such review.

The Stay

Without addressing the merits of the challenge to the new proxy access rules by Business Roundtable and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the SEC exercised its discretion to stay Rule 14a-11 and related amendments to the SEC's rules, including the amendment to Rule 14a-8, pending resolution of the petition filed in the Court of Appeals.  In granting the stay, the SEC found that a stay of Rule 14a-11 and related rule amendments avoids potentially unnecessary costs, regulatory uncertainty and disruption that could occur if the rules were to become effective during the pendency of a challenge to their validity.

What should you do now?

The new proxy access rules were to go in effect on November 15, 2010, and were to apply to the upcoming proxy season for companies other than smaller reporting companies that mailed their 2010 proxy statements on or after March 15, 2010. According to published reports, an SEC spokesman commented that the SEC expects the litigation to be resolved by next spring. As a result, implementation of the new proxy access rules subject of the dispute may be delayed until the 2012 proxy season for many companies. Given the uncertainty as to when the rules will take effect and whether they will be implemented in their present form, companies should consider holding off on implementing governance changes specifically related to proxy access for the time being.

What if you have questions?

For any questions or more information on these or any related matters, please contact an attorney.

Disclaimer

This update has been prepared by Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP for informational purposes only and does not constitute advertising, a solicitation, or legal advice, is not promised or guaranteed to be correct or complete and may or may not reflect the most current legal developments. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this update. 

Neither the content on this blog nor any transmissions between you and Sheppard Mullin through this blog are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship. 
 

Copyright © 2013, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Sheppard Mullin's securities and corporate finance practice includes a seasoned team of securities attorneys who represent a wide range of public companies and investment bankers. Our attorneys have significant experience in all areas of regulatory compliance and disclosure under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and capital formation under the Securities Act of 1933. We advise on corporate governance issues and have extensive experience advising boards, audit committees, compensation committees and nominating and governance committees of public companies. Our securities practice also...

202-469-4941.

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.