Advertisement

May 25, 2013

Senators Reach Out to Defense Contractors Who Contribute Heavily to Their Campaigns

On Friday, Politico's Morning Defense blog reported on a letter from a group of U.S. senators to a number of defense contractors requesting their insight on the effects of impending budget cuts referred to as "sequestration."

According to Politico, the senators were motivated to reach out to the companies because "the White House has refused to 'conduct any meaningful analysis' on how the automatic budget cuts would affect the industrial base."  The letter was sent to 15 companies; however, the report highlights seven: Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, General Dynamics, and United Technologies Corporation.

MapLight has conducted an analysis of campaign contributions from these companies and their employees to all current members of Congress as well as to the lawmakers mentioned in the report: Joe Lieberman, John McCain, Jim Inhofe, Saxby Chambliss, Kelly Ayotte, Lindsey Graham, and John Cornyn.

Click here to download a spreadsheet of campaign contributions.

Contributions from the Above Defense Contractors to Current Members of Congress: Jan. 1, 2001 - Jun. 30, 2011

 

Organization Total Contributions
Boeing $5,445,586
General Dynamics $3,913,882
L-3 Communications $1,357,808
Lockheed Martin $6,362,507
Northrop Grumman $4,259,340
Raytheon $4,250,275
United Technologies $2,823,491
   
Total $28,412,889

Contributions from the Mentioned Defense Contractors to the Seven Senators: Jan. 1, 2001 - Jun. 30, 2011

 

Organization Total Contributions
Boeing $158,199
General Dynamics $143,960
L-3 Communications $54,225
Lockheed Martin $300,925
Northrop Grumman $213,753
Raytheon $121,857
United Technologies $284,450
   
Total $1,277,369

METHODOLOGY: MapLight analysis of campaign contributions from Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, General Dynamics, and United Technologies Corporation and their respective employees to all current members of the U.S. House and Senate and to Joe Lieberman, John McCain, Jim Inhofe, Saxby Chambliss, Kelly Ayotte, Lindsey Graham, and John Cornyn from Jan. 1, 2001-June 30, 2011. Contributions data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics (OpenSecrets.org).

© Copyright 2013 MapLight

About the Author

MapLight is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, research organization that reveals money's influence on politics.

Elected officials collect large sums of money to run their campaigns, and they often pay back campaign contributors with special access and favorable laws. This common practice is contrary to the public interest, yet legal.

MapLight connects data on campaign contributions, politicians, votes, industries, companies, and more to show patterns of influence that could never be seen before. 

We currently research money and influence in the...

510-868-0894

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.