August 01, 2014
July 31, 2014
July 30, 2014
Sriracha Hot Sauce Plant Ordered to Cease Spicy Odors
A California state court recently put a major manufacturing plant for the popular sriracha hot sauce on the hot seat recently, ordering it to cease emitting odors, and the potential for odors, that would violate its facility permit. City of Irwindale v. Huy Fong Foods Inc., No. BC525856, Order Re: Prelim. Inj. (Cal. Sup. Ct., L.A. Co., Nov. 26, 2013).
Although the plant has been operating in Los Angeles County since the late 1980s, news sources have reported that the company began production in a new factory in Irwindale, CA in 2012. See Frank Shyong, Sriracha Sauce Factory Odor Causing Headaches, Burning Eyes, City Says,L.A. Times Oct. 28, 2013, available at http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-irwindale-sues-sriracha-20131028,0,2608897.story#axzz2j1T5nJF5. Plaintiffs, the City of Irwindale and the City Attorney, sued Respondent Huy Fong Foods Inc. due to complaints of approximately 30 residents that the spicy odors of the sauce were causing health problems, including irritating throats and eyes, and were also causing residents to avoid spending time outdoors in the area.
Plaintiff moved for a preliminary injunction enjoining Respondent from “operating or using” its sriracha plant. The court did not find sufficient evidence that Plaintiffs’ complained of health problems were tied to the plant’s emissions, but found that Plaintiffs were likely to prevail on their public nuisance claim because the odors were “extremely annoying, irritating, and offensive to the senses.” Order Re: Prelim. Inj., at 2. Accordingly, the court granted petitioners’ preliminary injunction in part and ordered Respondent to “immediately make changes in its site operations” to reduce odors and the potential for odors. Id. However, the court did not go so far as to enjoin the plant’s operations generally.
<span class="advertise"> Advertisement </span>
- Sixth Circuit Upholds Rule 11 Sanctions for “Meritless” Medical Monitoring Claims
- New York Appellate Panel Bars Medical Monitoring Damages Absent Injury
- A Shot in the Dark: Why Parents Should Not be Held Civilly Liable for Injuries Caused by Unvaccinated Children
- Claremont Club Case: It's Not Just Dodgeball Re: Club Liability
- A Doggone Problem for Landlords Re: Pets on Rental Property
- The Basics: Massachusetts Contingency Plan - Massachusetts Chapter 21E