April 19, 2014

Strategic Guidance for Blanket L-1 Visa Holders

With holiday travel rapidly approaching, we encourage our clients to closely note the recent guidance the U.S. Department of State (DOS) has issued for L-1 visa applicants. According to the DOS’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM), individuals seeking an L-1A or an L-1B visa will be issued a visa stamp in accordance with the validity periods listed in the reciprocity schedule (see “Reciprocity by Country” at for more information). This is a huge change. Historically visas were issued with more restrictive validity periods, and never beyond the expiration date of an L-1A or L-1B petition.

Five-year L-1 visas will become the norm in many cases

As a result of this rule, many L-1 nonimmigrants will receive L-1 visas valid for five years. This is a welcome change for many applicants. The expiration of an underlying individual or blanket L petition request may be approved for a period of three years or less. But visa stamps will likely be valid for five years in many cases. We anticipate this change to result in no confusion for individuals who hold L-1 visas issued pursuant to individual petitions. However, special attention should be given to the expiration date of a Form I-94 admission record; that date should be carefully tracked to monitor an individual’s status. A person’s status is expressly not controlled by the validity date on his or her visa. Rather, the date on a Form I-94 controls the period of one’s admission into the U.S.

Additional Concerns for L-1 visas issued pursuant to blanket petitions

Blanket L-1 visa holders need to exercise some additional caution in tracking their status, given the changes being implemented with five-year visa validity. Specifically, the discrepancy between a visa stamp expiration date and an L petition validity date creates an issue. Which date controls in terms of the L-1 visa holder’s status? What if U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is inconsistent, issuing in some cases Forms I-94 with expiration dates of five-year visas, and in other cases expiration dates based on the validity of a blanket petition or Form I-129S?

Recent guidance suggests that the duration of one’s status will be controlled by the date on an underlying Form I-129S. This appears to be a reasonable conclusion, and it is an important point for blanket L-1 visa holders who need to track their lawful status. But this issue is not yet fully settled. A comprehensive interagency review will hopefully address this conundrum.

Blanket L-1/L-2 visa holders should travel with a properly endorsed Form I-129S

We are noticing that some U.S. consular posts have been annotating visas to indicate that applicants must present an approved Form I-797 (individual petition approval notice) or Form I-129S along with their valid visa, when they appear at a U.S. port-of-entry.

For holders of blanket L-1/L-2 visas, we think that having an endorsed Form I-129S is sound planning when traveling and seeking re-entry into the U.S. with a visa. For individuals entering the U.S. pursuant to an approved blanket L petition, it is also critical to ensure that a U.S. consular post has properly endorsed a Form I-129S at a visa appointment. DOS also recommends that L-2 family members carry a copy of the principal spouse or parent’s L petition approval. We think that this cautious advice is prudent.

U.S. CBP officers make mistakes from time to time when determining and recording the permissible duration of L-1 and L-2 periods of stay. It is therefore very important to review any Form I-94 card that an L-1 or L-2 visa holder receives at entry into the U.S. On this note, U.S. CBP also considers passport validity with respect to one’s stated period of admission. So we advise all of our clients to renew their passports early, in addition to exercising caution and reviewing their new Forms I-94 when entering the U.S.

©1994-2014 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Douglas Hauer, Immigration Attorney, Mintz Levin Law Firm

Douglas is a Member in the firm's Immigration Practice and also practices in the Israel Business Group. His practice focuses on business immigration law, related government investigations, family-based green card sponsorship processes, EB-5 investor visa filings, and corporate immigration policy development.

He has represented multinational corporations in the financial services, technology, management consulting, hedge fund, specialty chemicals, insurance, defense, and engineering sectors. He has in-depth experience counseling corporate clients on the immigration...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.