Advertisement

April 18, 2014

Strategic Risk Management Not Widespread in Europe

Most risk managers, especially the ambitious ones, want to help shape corporate strategy. Their discipline, they say, can inform the major decisions just as well as it can define appropriate financial positions or dictate which risks to transfer through insurance.

In Europe, however, this is not happening. Only one-third of companies embed risk management into strategic decision making, according to a risk management benchmarking report by the Federation of European Risk Management Associations (FERMA), a Brussels-based risk management organization founded in 1974. By contrast, 66% of companies have only a “moderate” or “emerging” capability to use risk management for strategic decisions (which include those about major projects, investments, bids, contracts, acquisitions and budget allocations).

Puzzlingly, this remains the case despite respondents stating that top management and the board’s third-largest risk management goal should be to “align risk appetite with strategy.” And this also remains the case despite 46% of respondents believing that the recent financial and economic situation should lead to increased risk reporting to executive and board committees.

More troubling still for risk managers who want to be seen by management as more than policy buyers is the fact that “major insurance issues” was the only category that increased as a “major external factor triggering risk management within your company” since FERMA last did this biennial survey in 2010. At just 19% (up from 13% in 2010), insurance still ranks below several other factors, but, unlike insurance, all the rest fell.

At the end of the day, however, executives and board members are less concerned with how the average risk manager spends their day and more interested in overall value. And evidence suggests that the best-performing European companies are those that value risk management: a fact that no company executive would be wise to ignore.

According to the FERMA report, nearly three-quarters (74%) of companies that have an earnings growth rate of more than 20% have mature or advanced risk management practices. “We have long believed that good risk management contributes to sustainable corporate growth,” said FERMA President Jorge Luzzi. “Now we have clear evidence that there is a correlation.”

While a gap often remains between “advanced” risk management and true strategic risk management, most experts in the discipline consider the latter to be a further evolution of the former. And if you follow that logic, the higher up the ladder risk management climbs, so too may company profits.

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2014 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Senior Editor

Jared Wade is the senior editor of Risk Management magazine and the Risk Management Monitor blog.

212-655-5919

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.