Supreme Court Announces “Wipe-Out” of Yard-Man Presumption in Advance of Storm
Monday, January 26, 2015

With storm clouds threatening in the northeast, the Supreme Court cast a ray of sunlight for employers today by rejecting the use of a problematic inference in adjudicating claims for retiree benefits brought pursuant to collective bargaining agreements.  For many years, the Sixth Circuit has been applying the so-called “Yard-Man” inference, named after the decision in 1983 in which it was first crafted.  Pursuant to this inference, a collective bargaining agreement with ambiguous terms regarding  the duration of a promise of retiree welfare benefits is presumed to  contractually “vest” the retirees in these benefits, such that they cannot be removed after the expiration of the agreement.  In a unanimous opinion, the Court held that the Yard-Man inference was inconsistent with the application of ordinary principles of contract law and that the inference improperly placed a thumb on the scale in favor of vested retiree rights.  In so holding, the Court vacated the Sixth Circuit’s opinion, which had upheld a finding for the retirees following a bench trial, and remanded the case for the Sixth Circuit to apply ordinary principles of contract law in the first instance.  The case is M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett, 2015 WL 303218 (U.S. Jan. 26, 2015).

 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins