May 24, 2012

Survey of Wrongful Death Verdicts for the Very Young and Very Old

Cook County verdict values for wrongful death cases involving the very young and very old show that there is still large exposure for the right case despite the decedent’s age.  Age has typically been a mitigating factor keeping down verdicts and settlements for cases involving the very young and elderly.  However, after undertaking a review of all verdict results for Cook County in the last five years, the data reveals some very large verdicts despite the age. 

It is difficult to make sweeping conclusions from verdict reports alone especially in Cook County because there is such a wide variation from case to case, and of course, each case is dependent upon its own facts and the quality of the defense.  Additionally, it is important to note that the defense is still meritorious about two thirds more often than plaintiff at trial.  Even in Cook County it is still an up hill battle for any plaintiff.  There are also many, many reported settlements much lower than the values listed on the tables below.  However, of the cases that actually went to verdict in the last five years, it is clear there is still significant exposure in the cases that end up as a plaintiff verdict.  Below is a summary of the data for all wrongful death claims in a medical negligence case from 2005 to January, 2011, for children ages 0-9 and adults over the age of 80.

Wrongful Death Ages 0-9

Year Age Type of Case Verdict

2010

7 Days

Failure to admit child from ER despite heart desaturations

$4,000,000

2010

2

Failure to monitor during CT scan

$3,662,221

2009

9

Failure to diagnose necrotizing blastomycosis

$4,016,929

2009

Neonate, 
14 days

Failure to diagnose HELLP syndrome in mother (severe pre-eclapsia)

$6,171,119

2008

7

Inappropriate conscious sedation

$3,000,000

2008

4

Failure to diagnose meningitis

$7,000,000 (High/Low by doctor $985K - $1.8)

2007

0, Stillbirth

Failure to admit and perform c-section secondary to placental abruption

$1,651,166

2007

0, Stillbirth

Failure to diagnose placental abruption

$1,800,000

2006

2

Failure to advise mother of proper medication instructions

$75,000

Of forty-two verdicts reviewed that matched our search criteria of wrongful death between 2005 and 2011 of a child under 9, thirty-three had a not guilty verdict.  

Wrongful Death Ages 80+

Year Age Type of Case Verdict

2008

89

Failure to administer proper hypothyroidism medication

$1,750,000

2007

84

Failure to monitor while eating/choked

$500,000

2007

91

Fall at nursing home/head trauma

$454,762

2007

88

Negligence related to off label use of
medication

$75,000 (after 50% off
$150,000 due to contributory
negligence)

Of thirteen verdicts reviewed that matched our search criteria of wrongful death between 2005-2011 of an elderly adult age 80 or older, nine were a not guilty verdict.

After review of these end of the spectrum wrongful death verdicts, it is encouraging to the defense that the majority of these verdicts were not guilty verdicts.  Also, many more were settled in a range well under $1 million dollars.  However, to dismiss a case as insignificant in value based upon the age of the decedent would be a mistake.  As shown above, hospitals and other health care providers still face significant damage exposure, despite the age of the decedent, in certain scenarios.  To best position our clients litigating these geriatric and pediatric cases, we make every effort to aggressively work up the cases from all angles and mount a reasoned defense supported by well qualified experts early in the litigation process.  We find this aggressive litigation strategy best positions us to be able to resolve the case in a reasonable range and to obtain a not guilty verdict should the case be tried.

©2012 Johnson & Bell, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

Sammi L. Renken concentrates her practice in health care law, nursing home liability, medical and legal malpractice, and catastrophic injury. Ms. Renken has defended multiple area hospitals, clinics, long term care facilities, urgent care centers, group homes for minors with developmental disability, same day surgery centers, individual physicians and nurses. She has defended claims across the spectrum of health care litigation including: birth injury, pharmaceutical and medical device product liability claims, cardiac care, emergency medicine, EMTALA claims, anesthesia related...

312-984-0261

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.