April 25, 2014

Temporary Custody and Visitation in Virginia Fairfax County Circuit Court

The Circuit Court of Fairfax County is the largest jurisdiction in Virginia, and certainly one of the busiest. In most cases, the Court will not hear motions for temporary rulings on custody and visitation. A Motion for Pendente Lite Relief is a request of the Court to enter a temporary order that would remain in place until a final order is entered, whether by agreement or after a trial.

In many divorce matters where physical custody of a child is in question, parents are unable to reach an agreement.  A motion forPendente Lite relief, however, is usually not an option in the Fairfax County Circuit Court, absent extenuating circumstances.  If a parent is denying access to a child, or if a child is in immediate physical danger while in the custody of one parent, the court may hear a motion for temporary custody.    

If circumstances require a prompt decision regarding custody, a final trial can be expedited and requested through judges' chambers.  In the meantime, the parties are left to work it out amongst themselves and their attorneys.  An important consideration to keep in mind is that the Court will certainly consider the actions of parents, while custody is pending, when determining final custody. Denial of access to the child, poor communication with the other parent, or unilateral decision-making can negatively affect a parties' request for custody.

© 2014 Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.

About the Author

Kristina  A. Cruz, Family Law Attorney, Odin Feldman Law Firm

Kristina Cruz believes the best approach to assist her clients is to blend her legal knowledge with each individual client's unique personal objectives to ensure that every relationship is built upon a foundation of mutual trust and client input into the legal process. A background in journalism combined with powerful listening skills enable Kristina to understand the full extent of a family or domestic relation situation and communicate those matters succinctly and effectively in the courtroom. Clearly comprehending all aspects of each individual case gives Kristina the ability to...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specializat