May 25, 2012

Upcoming Changes to Your County’s Bullying, Harassment and Intimidation Policy (WV)

WV House Bill 3225 was approved by both the West Virginia House and the Senate, and is awaiting the Governor’s signature. If signed by the Governor, which is expected, each county board of education is required to update their Bullying, Harassment and Intimidation Policy.1 The Bill amends both West Virginia Code §§ 18A-2C-2 and 18A-2C-3, and West Virginia State Board of Education Policy 4373 (Student Code of Conduct).

House Bill 3225 expands the definition of harassment, intimidation or bullying to include cyber-bullying. Specifically, the amendment reads as follows:2

(a) As used in this article, “harassment, intimidation or bullying” means any intentional gesture, or any intentional electronic, written, verbal or physical act, communication, transmission or threat . . ."

The newly expanded definition also includes acts that would physically or emotionally harm a student, as well as conduct that disrupts or interferes with the orderly operation of schools. Specifically, the amendment reads as follows, providing that any of the acts set forth above constitute harassment, intimidation or bullying IF:

(a) (1) A reasonable person under the circumstances should know [the conduct] will have the effect of any one or more of the following:

            (1) (A) Physically harming a student;

            (2) (B) Damaging a student’s property;

            (3) (C) Placing a student in reasonable fear of harm to his or her person; or

            (4) (D) Placing a student in reasonable fear of damage to his or her property; or

(b) (2) Is sufficiently severe, persistent or pervasive that it creates an intimidating, threatening or emotionally abusive educational environment for a student; or

            (3) Disrupts or interferes with the orderly operation of the school.

(b) As used in this article, an electronic act, communication, transmission or threat includes but is not limited to one which is administered via telephone, wireless phone, computer, pager or any electronic or wireless device whatsoever, and includes but is not limited to transmission of any image or voice, email or text message using any such device.
 

House Bill 3225 also expands the areas where harassment, intimidation or bullying is prohibited to include school buses and bus stops. Specifically, the amendment reads as follows:

 

(1) A statement prohibiting harassment, intimidation or bullying of any student on school property, a school bus, at a school bus stop or at school sponsored events

As we all know, educators and school administrators find an increasing amount of student internet content posted by students to be offensive or threatening to other students and staff members. Prior to House Bill 3225, the Student Code of Conduct and similar policies’ applications were expressly limited to student conduct during education-sponsored events and school-sponsored activities.  But, schools are not and have not been powerless. House Bill 3225 only restates what the existing law is and has been for a number of years. That is, schools may discipline students that generate offensive or threatening internet content off school premises as long as the content materially disrupts the educational process or school operations, or presents a reasonable risk of disruption.3

It is recommended that county boards of education provide training to employees, in particular building administrators, as well as providing education to students, on topics such as “cyber-bullying” and “sexting”.4  House Bill 3225, along with cyber-bullying issues, understandably creates apprehension among building administrators.  With updated training, this apprehension could be eased by providing education to all concerned regarding how to navigate this scary new world of cyberspace within the context of the school environment.5


(1) The amended code requires that county board shall adopt the policy and submit a copy to the State Superintendent of Schools by December 1, 2011.

(2) The amendments are underlined.

(3) Free Speech Rights of Students Present "Cyber-Troubles", May 4, 2010, Jason S. Long

(4) Tips for School Administrators on How to Handle "Sexting", March 1, 2010, Jason S. Long and Jennifer S. Caradine.

(5) For example, we have done workshops on: What can school districts do to protect their communities from offensive or threatening student cyber-activity?

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Jason's practice concentrates on two areas of law that are quite diverse from each other. One area of Jason’s practice focuses on enforcing the collection rights and security interests of creditors. In this area of the law, he also has experience in defending creditors and debt collection entities in litigation where claims have been asserted against such entities for alleged violations of the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protect Act (“WVCCPA”) and/or the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. In addition, he has experience in defending automobile...

304-225-1417

About the Author

Of Counsel

Denise Spatafore is a member of the Labor and Employment Department. She focuses her practice on education law. Prior to joining the firm, Denise served as the Supervisor of Personnel for the Harrison County Board of Education. As the administrator in charge, she led the personnel department of a school system with approximately 2,000 employees, providing both human resources management and legal services. Earlier in her career, Denise served as an Administrative Law Judge for the West Virginia Public Employees Grievance Board.

304-225-1445

Contributors

Associate

Jennifer S. Caradine is a member of the Corporate Department. Jennifer's practice focuses on two distinct areas of the law, first she practices real estate law, covering a wide range of matters with emphasis on title, acquisitions, sales and financing, foreclosure and mineral issues.  Jennifer also practices in the area of school law, providing services in areas including, but not limited to, defending special education due process complaints, board of education real estate issues, personnel issues and student rights and discipline.

...

304-225-1430

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.