February 8, 2012

USCIS Statistics Show Troubling Adjudication Disparities

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) operates four Service Centers that adjudicate applications and petitions filed by employers and individuals. These applications and petitions seek immigration benefits under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The California Service Center (in Laguna Niguel, Calif.) and the Vermont Service Center (in St. Albans, Vt.) adjudicate H-1B Specialty Occupation, L-1 Intracompany Transferee, O-1 Extraordinary Ability, and P-1 Professional Athlete/Artist/Entertainer petitions (among others). Statistics recently obtained by The Los Angeles Times reflect some disturbing inconsistencies in each Center’s approval, denial and request-for-evidence rates regarding H-1B, L-1, O-1, and P-1 adjudications.

For example, in the current fiscal year, the percentage of L-1 cases denied by the California Service Center (CSC) – 26.7% – is more than twice that of the Vermont Service Center (VSC)’s 10.4%. Similarly, the CSC issued more than twice as many requests for evidence (RFEs) in L-1 cases as compared with the VSC. A surprising 40% of L-1 cases filed with the CSC trigger an RFE.

O-1 and P-1 cases fair just as poorly at the CSC. In the current fiscal year, the CSC’s O-1 denial rate is running at 19.6%; the VSC’s is just 5.5%. Whereas the VSC issued RFEs in 16.4% of the O-1 cases it reviewed, the CSC issued RFEs in 37.5%. The disparity in P-1 cases is even more shocking: the CSC issued RFEs in a whopping 44.3% of P-1 cases it reviewed and denied 26.8%; the VSC issued RFEs in 14.9% and denied only 3.9%.

The full statistical tables for FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010 (through July 2010) can be viewed here. The Los Angeles Times article is available here

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Gregory P. Adams is a Partner in the Corporate Department and Chair of the Immigration Practice Group. Greg concentrates his practice on U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law. He counsels domestic and international businesses, educational institutions, and not-for-profit entities regarding temporary and permanent business-, employment-, and investment-related U.S. visas. He has represented high tech (Route 128/495) clients on immigration cases for two decades, including development of immigration policies and the architecture and procedures for handling large volumes of cases. Greg also...

513-977-8125

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.