July 24, 2014

USCIS (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) Conducts Lottery After FY2015 H-1B Cap Reached

On April 10 2014, the USCIS announced that the agency has received approximately 172,500 H-1B petitions during the initial filing period, including petitions filed for the advanced degree exemption. The USCIS started accepting FY2015 H-1B cap petitions on April 1, 2014 and stopped processing them five business days later on April 7, 2014 when the agency announced that the FY2015 H-1B cap had been reached.  On April 10, 2014, the USCIS used a computer-generated lottery to select the H-1B petitions for the capped visa allotments of 65,000 for the general category and 20,000 under the advanced degree exemption limit. The agency conducted the selection process for advanced degree exemption petitions first. All advanced degree petitions not selected during the initial lottery were part of the random selection process for the 65,000 limit.  For cap-subject petitions that were not randomly selected, the agency stated that it will reject and return the petition with filing fees, unless it is found to be a duplicate filing. USCIS will continue to accept H-1B petitions that are not subject to the cap. 

In 2013, the USCIS received 124,000 cap-subject petitions. There was no lottery from 2009 to 2012 due to a downturn in the U.S. economy, although the H-1B numbers were exhausted each of those years. Prior to this, in 2008 the agency received 163,000 petitions within five days. With the cap being met so quickly, U.S. employers have no guarantee they can hire the much needed skilled workers. This year’s lottery confirms that the demand for high-skilled workers far exceeds the supply and demonstrates the current system is outdated and broken.  Clearly immigration reform is needed to revamp the H-1B program.

USCIS indicated they will start processing the premium processing H-1B petitions selected in the lottery no later than April 28, 2014.  Today, GT has already received receipt notices for some FY2015 H-1B cap cases that were filed via premium processing and will notify employers quickly once we have either a receipt notice or a rejection of the filing.  Given the high number of applications received, the casualties of those not receiving an H-1B number will be high.  GT will continue to monitor this situation but recommends employers conduct a review and assessment of alternative options for any employee not selected in this year’s cap.  For additional information about the H-1B cap or a particular H-1B case, please contact your GT Attorney.

©2014 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Kristin Bolayir, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, Immigration, Assistant Director
Assistant Director

Kristin Bolayir's legal career spans twenty years including over sixteen years of experience in immigration. Kristin specializes in business immigration law, especially complex and writing-intensive nonimmigrant and immigrant cases. Her experience in immigration involves nonimmigrant and immigrant solutions for the business, research, information technology, education and entertainment communities. Kristin leads a team of immigration professionals, supervises and mentors paralegals involved in a variety of business immigration matters, and provides training for new paralegals...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.