Advertisement

May 21, 2013

What To Do When Your .CN Domain Name Is Already Taken

When looking into registering domain names in Asia, companies often encounter the problem that their .cn domain names in China have already been registered by someone else. Companies who are zealous about protecting their brands should consider reclaiming their .cn domains.

There are three channels for reclaiming a .cn domain name from a prior registrant: (1) negotiating and purchasing the domain name; (2) filing a civil lawsuit in China; and (3) initiating a dispute resolution action in China. This article focuses on the dispute resolution option.

China Internet Network Information Center (“CNNIC”) controls all issues related to .cn domains in China. Disputes over .cn domains are governed by the CNNIC Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”). Both domain name registrars and registrants agree to be governed by the Policy and be bound by the decision of a Dispute Resolution Service Provider (the “Provider”) after a dispute resolution proceeding.

Through a dispute resolution action, a company can request that the Provider either cancel the prior registration or transfer the prior registration to the company. According to Article 8 of the Policy, there are three elements to the company’s claim: (1) the disputed domain name is identical with or confusingly similar to the company’s trademark or trade name in which the company has civil rights or interests; (2) the registrant has no right or legitimate interest in the domain name or a major part of the domain name; and (3) the registrant has registered or is using the domain name in bad faith.  It is the company’s duty to prove elements (1) and (3).

A company has a strong case for showing that it has civil rights or interests in a trademark when it has a registered trademark in mainland China. Without a Chinese trademark registration, a company can still establish rights through proof of use of its trade name in other countries.

According to Article 9 of the Policy, a company can prove the bad faith element by evidence supporting the following: (i) the purpose for registering the domain name is to sell, rent or otherwise transfer the domain name registration to the company and to obtain unjustified benefits; (ii) the registrant registered the domain name in order to prevent the company from using the name or the mark in a corresponding domain name, provided that the registrant has been engaged in a pattern of such conduct; or (iii) the registrant has registered or acquired the domain name for the purpose of damaging the company’s reputation, disrupting the company’s normal business or creating confusion with the company’s name or mark so as to mislead the public.

A dispute resolution action generally takes two and a half months from beginning to end. The process does not involve oral questioning of the parties. The decision of the Provider can be readily enforced by CNNIC through the domain name registrar.

© 2009 Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

About the Author

The Shanghai Office is Sheppard Mullin's first overseas office and serves as the center of the Firm’s Asia practices. The Office handles international matters involving not only China but also Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, and other markets in the region.

The attorneys and legal consultants in the Office have legal expertise in the corporate, commercial, trade, and disputes fields.  The Office is fully integrated into the Firm’s established practice groups, thus allowing for seamless service across borders and time zones.

For...

86.21.2321.6100

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.