July 26, 2014

The Winds of Immigration Reform Blow Again - Part 1

At the time of this writing, immigration reform is front and center in media and policy circles in Washington, D.C. The U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Boehner has announced that his side of the Congress "basically" has a deal on immigration. The bipartisan Senate group (gang of eight) just announced its principles for comprehensive immigration reform (CIR) and the president is set to announce his CIR plan as well.

The call for CIR to address the seriously broken immigration system began in the late 1990s. There was and continues to be a central recognition that the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 left the immigration system without a key component - a workable non-immigrant visa system program for lesser-skilled workers to enter the United States. Following the 1986 amnesty, workers streamed across the border in unlawful status to the tune of almost 12 million. These workers became embedded in the U.S. workforce. From construction to health care to food processing, undocumented workers permeated the U.S. workforce. It was estimated that this undocumented workforce made up about five percent of the U.S. workforce. It was also estimated that about 70 percent of those undocumented workers were from Mexico. The immigration policy debates blow hot and cold and are now blowing steadily.

Some of the key principles for immigration reform concerning the workforce were and are:

  • Reform should be comprehensive, addressing future workforce needs, the existing unauthorized worker population, and a workable employment eligibility verification system.
  • Reform should create an immigration system that allows for sufficient numbers of immigrants and temporary workers to meet the economic needs of the country.
  • Reform should create a program for hard working, tax paying unauthorized workers to earn permanent status after meeting strict requirements, such as law enforcement screening and learning English.
  • Reform should create a fair employment eligibility verification system that functions efficiently, effectively, and inexpensively for employers, workers and government agencies.
  • Reform should ensure that U.S. workers are not displaced by foreign workers.
  • Reform should strengthen homeland security by providing for the screening of foreign workers and creating a disincentive for illegal immigration.
  • Reform should strengthen the rule of law by establishing clear, sensible immigration laws that are efficiently and vigorously enforced.

If Congress and the president can join together, the winds of CIR might actually become new policy.

Read the rest of the series:

The Winds of Immigration Reform Blow Again - Part 2

©2014 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Co-Managing Shareholder, Tysons Corner Office

Laura Reiff focuses her practice on business immigration laws and regulations affecting U.S. and foreign companies, as well as related employment compliance and legislative issues. 


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.