February 7, 2012

Diane J. Romza-Kutz, Partner

  • 312-759-1922
  • diane.kutz@troutmansanders.com
  • www.troutmansanders.com

  • Diane is a member of the firm’s Intellectual Property Practice Group and is the team leader for the firm’s Life Sciences Practice Team. She focuses her practice on federal and state regulatory issues, licensing arrangements and related complex litigation matters particular to the Life Sciences Industry and which often stem from regulatory issues under the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and related state agencies. Additionally, Diane’s practice encompasses representation of clients involved in the tobacco industry and the evolving regulatory issues involving the FDA as a result of the enactment of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Her practice includes negotiating global licensing negotiations, FDA, FTC and USDA regulatory matters, and international arbitration, complex litigation, including preemption claims, misbranding, duty to warn and more generally, product liability/toxic tort cases. Diane has served as vice chair of the American Health Lawyers Association’s Committee on Managed Care and Integrated Delivery Systems. She has also served as a member of the Executive Healthcare Council for the Illinois Chamber of Commerce. Prior to joining Troutman Sanders, Diane was a partner at both a national and international law firm.

  • Troutman Sanders LLP

Articles in the National Law Review database by Diane J. Romza-Kutz:

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.