Michael is a highly regarded intellectual property litigator and patent strategist who helps clients protect and generate revenue from their patent holdings. Intellectual Asset Magazine has repeatedly recognized him in its select IAM Patent 1000 and IAM Patent Strategy 300 publications. Clients rely on his counsel regarding sensitive licensing agreement negotiations, acquisitions, and other technology transactions. He leads a team known for its ability to translate complex technology and its value to non-technical professionals — in court and business negotiations.
Michael is Division Head for the Intellectual Property Section at Mintz and serves as a member on the firm’s Policy Committee. He is an experienced litigator known for his business approach to creating value in patent assets. His success on behalf of clients comes from his ability to identify the value drivers in a portfolio and communicate that value to competitors, investors, purchasers, licensees, counsel, judges, and juries.
With a background in mechanical engineering and nearly 20 years’ experience practicing law, he has the combination of technical and legal skills essential to a strategic patent practice. He has achieved courtroom victories and negotiated favorable settlements on behalf of both patent owners and accused infringers in complex negotiations and protracted litigation.
Michael develops strategies for and guides clients through monetization programs for complex technology portfolios. Several recent monetization programs have each returned tens of millions of dollars through litigation, licensing, and sale activities.
Michael also advises clients on patent portfolio assessment and conducts IP due diligence in connection with transactions. He counsels private equity firms and venture capital funds on IP assets and patent value. He also helps patent owners develop and implement strategies for identifying and leveraging untapped assets in their patent portfolios.
He has particularly deep experience litigating Section 337 matters before the International Trade Commission and has also achieved significant success in Federal District Courts, including the Eastern District of Texas, District of Delaware, Northern District of California, District of Massachusetts, and numerous others.
Michael’s technology experience includes electromechanical systems, digital cameras, embedded microprocessors, telecommunications and network software, cellular phones, and e-commerce, among others.
More Legal and Business Bylines From Michael T. Renaud
- Why is the ITC a Great Venue for Protecting Trade Secrets? Speed and Extraterritorial Authority - (Posted On Thursday, May 12, 2022)
- The ITC Should Put Its Foot Down on Patent Hold-out and Hold-up - (Posted On Monday, May 09, 2022)
- Avoiding Unforced Tech DI Errors at the ITC - (Posted On Saturday, March 12, 2022)
- No Harm, No Foul, and No Standing for Would-be SEP Implementer: 5th Circuit Changes Narrative on Patent “Hold Up” - (Posted On Thursday, March 03, 2022)
- Patent Owner Tips for Surviving an Instituted IPR: From Depositions to Sur-Replies [VIDEO] - (Posted On Friday, January 14, 2022)
- Uncertain Seas for SEP Sailing In the US – New Guidance May Cause Stormy SEP Future - (Posted On Thursday, December 09, 2021)
- Apple Backs Down: Commits to Take Global FRAND License to Avoid Exile from UK Market - (Posted On Friday, November 05, 2021)
- Optis Puts Apple’s Feet to the UK Fire: Commit to FRAND or Be Snuffed Out - (Posted On Monday, October 04, 2021)
- The Road Less Travelled: Why Arbitration is an Increasingly Attractive Alternative for Resolving IP Disputes - (Posted On Sunday, September 26, 2021)
- When It Isn’t Better Late Than Never: ALJ Reins in on Redesigns First Disclosed in the Last Week of Fact Discovery - (Posted On Tuesday, September 21, 2021)