Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction

Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
(incl: International Trade (Customs), Federal Claims, Armed Forces, Federal Adm. Agencies & Boards, Immigration, Tax, Gov. Personnel Appeals, Patent , Trademark, Veterans Appeals, etc.)

Custom text Title Organization
Feb
2
2023
 FinTech Prevails in Texas “True Lender” Challenge Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
3
2023
 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschlan GMBH v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
22
2024
 The Importance of Reasonable Particularity in a Doctrine of Equivalents Argument Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
12
2015
 August 2015 Summary of Recent Precedential Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
22
2011
 California Court Of Appeal Holds That Employees Lose Reinstatement Rights If They Fail To Return To Work During The 12-Week Leave Period Protected Under CFRA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2011
 Tenth Circuit Holds that "Forced Sellers" Resulting From a Squeeze Out Merger Lack Standing to Assert Claims Under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) the Securities Act of 1933 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
 Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. Nos. 2022-1532, 2022-1533, (Fed. Cir. August 7, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
 PTAB’s Authority to Issue a Final Written Decision After a Statutory Deadline Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
22
2024
 Identifying Protocols by Name May Disclose Sufficient Structure for Computer-Implemented Means-Plus-Function Limitations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2016
 Federal Circuit Won’t Review USPTO’s Alice Guidelines Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2016
 Patent Trial and Appeal Board Institutes 17 Inter Partes Reviews for TCL Communication Technology Holdings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
14
2016
 En Banc: Federal Circuit Provides Guidance on Application of On-Sale Bar to Contract Manufacturers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2017
 Suing The United States Government For Patent Infringement And Defending Against A Claim Of Obviousness Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
30
2010
 Ninth Circuit Holds That Safe Harbor Provision Of The Reform Act Applies To Forward-Looking Statements Accompanied By Cautionary Language And Forward-Looking Statements Made Without Actual Knowledge Of Falsity Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
27
2011
 California Court of Appeal Refuses to Permit an Action for Rescission of a Strategic Transaction, Holding That a Board Has No Duty Under California Law to Include a "Fiduciary Out" Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
18
2011
 Second Circuit Holds that Falsity of Estimates of Goodwill and Loan Loss Reserves For Purposes of Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 Hinges on the Speakers' Subjective Belief in the Estimates' Accuracy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
15
2017
 NLRB Overrules Browning-Ferris Joint Employer Standard Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
16
2019
 Perils of Waiting: PTAB’s Precedential Opinion Panel Designates Two More Decisions Rejecting 315(b) Arguments Regarding Time Bars Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
5
2021
 Cementing Victory by Accepting Defeat: When Can a Patentee’s Infringement Disclaimer Moot an Appeal of an IPR Decision? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
28
2022
 Recent Expansion of IPR Estoppel Scope Viewed As Victory for Patent Owners Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
 Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., Chilisin America Ltd. Nos. 2022-1873, (Fed. Cir. October 16, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
 Anticipation and Obviousness in Patent Law: An Analysis of Recent IPR Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
1
2015
 Summary of Recent Precedential Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
10
2010
 A Retreat From Hard Line OCI Decisions? The COFC Overturns a Controversial GAO Ruling Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
20
2011
 NLRB Requires Employer to Rehire and Provide Backpay to Employees Terminated for Derogatory Comments Made About Co-Worker on Facebook Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
14
2014
 Interior’s Carcieri Opinion Means More Diligence for Trust Land Development Projects Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
26
2019
 Arkansas and Kentucky Halt Medicaid Work Requirements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
28
2022
 Federal Circuit Deems Algorithm Potentially Valid Trade Secret Notwithstanding Prior Publication Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
23
2023
 Senators Propose New Legislation to Clarify Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
 Federal Circuit’s Determination on Whether Fraudulent Conduct in Obtaining Incontestable Status Warrants the Mark’s Cancellation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
 “Comparison Prior Art” Must Be Tied to the Same Article of Manufacture as That Claimed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2015
 Summary of Recent Precedential Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions – June 2015 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2016
 NLRB Continues to Target Employers’ Social Media Policies Poyner Spruill LLP
Aug
1
2013
 Labor Board Affirms Ruling that Employer Confidentiality Provision Violates National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) Poyner Spruill LLP
Sep
2
2009
 New IRS Revenue Rulings: Amount and Character of Income on Life Insurance Contracts Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP
Subscribe to Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins