Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction

Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
(incl: International Trade (Customs), Federal Claims, Armed Forces, Federal Adm. Agencies & Boards, Immigration, Tax, Gov. Personnel Appeals, Patent , Trademark, Veterans Appeals, etc.)

Custom text Title Organization
Sep
16
2009
 TRANSAMERICA LIFE FOUND TO INFRINGE “BUSINESS METHOD PATENT” ON VARIABLE ANNUITIES Clark Hill PLC
Dec
17
2011
 Illinois Supreme Court Establishes A New Test To Determine Whether Non-Compete Agreements Are Enforceable Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
24
2014
 Lighting Ballast v. Philips – Federal Circuit Will Maintain De Novo Review of Claim Construction Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
10
2014
 Patent Co-Owner’s Refusal to Join Suit Defeats Standing to Sue for Patent Infringement Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
15
2015
 Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc. – Another Diagnostic Patent Meets its End Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
7
2016
 Supreme Court Holds Profit from Components of Infringing Product Can Be Appropriate Measure of Design Patent Damages Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
3
2017
 Continuing Uncertainty in a Survey of IPR Estoppel Decisions under § 315(e)(2) Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
25
2017
 Federal Circuit Rejects District Court’s Invalidity Finding Based on Key Tenets of Non-Obviousness Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Nov
20
2014
 Antares Pharma Bolsters the “Original Patent” Rule for Reissued Patents Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
13
2015
 At the Board: Post Grant Proceedings at the PTAB Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
27
2017
 PTAB Holds That Sovereign Immunity Applies to IPR Proceedings and Is a Defense Available to State Entities Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
16
2017
 Federal Circuit Clarifies Boundaries of Discovery During Litigation Under the BPCIA Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
27
2017
 Federal Circuit Finds Inventor Testimony Inadequate to Establish A Common Inventive Entity Under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
5
2017
 Federal Circuit Rejects PTAB’s Articulation of Obviousness Rationale, Disregard for Evidence, and Burden Shifting Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
4
2017
 Federal Circuit Applies 11th Amendment Immunity to Inventorship Claims Against State University Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
27
2017
 Federal Circuit Holds that the USPTO May Recover Attorneys’ Fees in Actions Under 35 U.S.C. § 145 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
19
2015
 It’s Status Quo for Now: Federal Circuit Denies Petition for Rehearing En Banc in Amgen v. Sandoz Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
31
2015
 An Update on Biosimilar Activity in the U.S. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
23
2015
 Federal Circuit Says USPTO Can’t Refuse Registration of Disparaging Trademarks Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
5
2017
 Supreme Court Rejects Federal Circuit’s Restrictive View of Patent Exhaustion Doctrine: Impression Products v. Lexmark Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
1
2015
 Inter Partes Review – 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) One Year Bar and Exceptions Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
2
2016
 U.S. Supreme Court Listens to Oral Arguments Regarding Claim Construction and Appellate Review of Institution Decisions in AIA Trials Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
12
2017
 Federal Circuit Reverses Eastern District of Texas Denial of Attorneys’ Fees Motion Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
8
2017
 PTAB Obviousness Determination Vacated and Remanded for Flawed Analysis of Unexpected Results Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
2
2011
 Section 145 Action to Obtain a Patent Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
5
2014
 Public Interest Petitioner Lacks Standing for Appeal from PTO Reexamination Proceeding - Patent and Trademark Office Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
3
2015
 Update in Amgen v. Sandoz re: Biosimilar Applications Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
6
2016
 Federal Circuit Rules Biosimilar Notice of Commercial Marketing Mandatory Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
13
2016
 Federal Circuit Clarifies When an Invention is the Subject of a Commercial Sale or Offer for Sale for Purposes of the On-Sale Bar Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
12
2011
 The Supreme Court is Set to Decide Whether the Ministerial Exception Will Continue to Protect Religious Institutions from Discrimination Claims Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
11
2014
 DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com: Federal Circuit Affirms Patent Eligibility for Some Types of Internet-based Claims Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
27
2010
 Prior Art Date for Patent Can Go Back to Provisional Filing Date Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
26
2011
 Federal Circuit Ruling Tightens Standard For Inequitable Conduct Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
18
2012
 Federal Arbitration Act Trumps Credit Repair Organizations Act Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
18
2017
 Genband v. Metaswitch Outlines Permanent Injunction Standards for Infringing Sales of Multicomponent Products Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Subscribe to Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins