Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction

Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
(incl: International Trade (Customs), Federal Claims, Armed Forces, Federal Adm. Agencies & Boards, Immigration, Tax, Gov. Personnel Appeals, Patent , Trademark, Veterans Appeals, etc.)

Custom text Title Organization
Sep
6
2010
 Arguing Obviousness After KSR: Are We Coming Full Circle? (Fed. Cir. 2010) Vedder Price
Oct
1
2017
 Argument for Divided Infringement Goes Off the Rails McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
4
2022
 Argument Forfeit in Remand Notwithstanding Modified Claim Construction McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
10
2014
 Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Limited: Final Written Decision (Motion to Amend) IPR2012-00022 Faegre Drinker
Jun
3
2014
 Ariosa Diagnostics v. The Board of Trusees of the Leland Standford Junior University: Guidance on Patent Owner’s Options if Petitioner’s Reply Presents New Evidence Faegre Drinker
Oct
30
2014
 Ariosa Diagnostics v. Verinata Health, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00276 Faegre Drinker
Jan
24
2016
 Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc., Final Written Decision Upholding Challenged Claims IPR2014-01093 Faegre Drinker
Jun
15
2015
 Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc. – Another Diagnostic Patent Meets its End Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
22
2016
 Ariosa Loses Verinata Patent Challenge Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
3
2015
 Ariosa v. Sequenom – Cert. Denied Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
12
2015
 Ariosa v. Sequenom – Novel Genetic Analysis Fails The Mayo Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
4
2015
 Ariosa v. Sequenom: In Search of Yes After a Decade of No Texas A&M University School of Law
Dec
18
2015
 Arisdyne Systems v. Cavitation Tech: Order Advising that Cross-Examination Will Occur Before At Least One Member of the Board IPR2015-00977 Faegre Drinker
Oct
31
2017
 Arista Networks, Inc. v. International Trade Commission,: Limited Exclusion Order Does Not Require Specific Findings as to Components McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
26
2019
 Arkansas and Kentucky Halt Medicaid Work Requirements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
14
2014
 ARM Inc. v. Vantage Point Technology, Inc., Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00467 Faegre Drinker
Jan
17
2017
 Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Shoots Down DCAA Overreach on Responsibility to Manage Subcontractors Covington & Burling LLP
Sep
28
2016
 Army Ammunition Goes Green and Infringement Free McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
1
2016
 Arris Group and Cox Communications v. C-Cation Technologies: Order Expunging Supplemental Evidence Exhibits IPR2015-00635 Faegre Drinker
Aug
20
2015
 Arris Group v. C-Cation Tech: Indemnitor Merely Sending Advice Does Not Result in Privity IPR2015-00635 Faegre Drinker
Sep
12
2015
 Arris Group v. Cirrex Systems: Infringement Complaint Provides Notice of Infringement for All Patent Claims IPR2015-00530 Faegre Drinker
Jan
7
2015
 Arris Group, Inc. v. C-Cation Technologies, LLC, IPR2014-00746: Denying Rehearing of Decision Not to Institute Faegre Drinker
Jul
7
2014
 Arris Group, Inc. v. C-Cation Technologies, LLC, Order Granting Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00746 Faegre Drinker
Sep
27
2018
 Art. III Standing Required for Appeal from AIA Proceeding McDermott Will & Emery
May
20
2021
 Arthrex Argument May Be Available in Round Two McDermott Will & Emery
May
27
2020
 Arthrex Extended to Inter Partes Re-examination McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2020
 Arthrex Stands (For Now) Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
30
2020
 Arthrex’s Initial Merits Brief – Making the Case for Patent Judges as Principal Officers Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
1
2017
 Article III Injury-in-Fact Required to Appeal PTAB Final Written Decision in IPR McDermott Will & Emery
May
7
2020
 Article III Standing Required to Appeal Final Decisions by the PTAB McDermott Will & Emery
May
13
2020
 Articles that Infringe Only after Importation can be Excluded by the ITC Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
2
2022
 Artificial Intelligence Cannot Serve as an Inventor of a Patentable Invention Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Dec
25
2014
 Artsana USA, Inc. v. Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc.: Decision to Institute with Partial Denial IPR2014-01053 Faegre Drinker
Apr
8
2015
 Artsana USA, Inc. v. Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc.: Granting Request for Adverse Judgment IPR2014-01053 Faegre Drinker
Aug
5
2021
 As Due Process Recognizes, it’s Hard to Shoot at a Moving Claim Construction Target McDermott Will & Emery
Subscribe to Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins