Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction

Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
(incl: International Trade (Customs), Federal Claims, Armed Forces, Federal Adm. Agencies & Boards, Immigration, Tax, Gov. Personnel Appeals, Patent , Trademark, Veterans Appeals, etc.)

Custom text Title Organization
Jun
27
2017
 Federal Circuit Holds that the USPTO May Recover Attorneys’ Fees in Actions Under 35 U.S.C. § 145 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
19
2015
 It’s Status Quo for Now: Federal Circuit Denies Petition for Rehearing En Banc in Amgen v. Sandoz Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
5
2017
 Supreme Court Rejects Federal Circuit’s Restrictive View of Patent Exhaustion Doctrine: Impression Products v. Lexmark Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
31
2015
 An Update on Biosimilar Activity in the U.S. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
23
2015
 Federal Circuit Says USPTO Can’t Refuse Registration of Disparaging Trademarks Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
2
2016
 U.S. Supreme Court Listens to Oral Arguments Regarding Claim Construction and Appellate Review of Institution Decisions in AIA Trials Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
12
2017
 Federal Circuit Reverses Eastern District of Texas Denial of Attorneys’ Fees Motion Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
8
2017
 PTAB Obviousness Determination Vacated and Remanded for Flawed Analysis of Unexpected Results Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
1
2015
 Inter Partes Review – 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) One Year Bar and Exceptions Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
6
2016
 Federal Circuit Rules Biosimilar Notice of Commercial Marketing Mandatory Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
13
2016
 Federal Circuit Clarifies When an Invention is the Subject of a Commercial Sale or Offer for Sale for Purposes of the On-Sale Bar Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
2
2011
 Section 145 Action to Obtain a Patent Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
5
2014
 Public Interest Petitioner Lacks Standing for Appeal from PTO Reexamination Proceeding - Patent and Trademark Office Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
3
2015
 Update in Amgen v. Sandoz re: Biosimilar Applications Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
25
2016
 Student Assistants at Private Schools are Deemed “Employees” and May Form Unions Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jun
13
2023
 Defeating Obviousness Rejections by Arguing Against Improper Prior Art Modifications Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
May
22
2017
 Texas’ Loss is Delaware’s Gain: Navigating the Post-TC Heartland Landscape of Patent Litigation Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
23
2014
 Reflective Apparel Seeks Declaratory Judgment That Safety Vest Does Not Reflect Competitor's Patent Claims Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Dec
9
2023
 Unpredictability In The Art: Amgen v. Sanofi In View Of “Simultaneous Conception And Reduction To Practice” Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
2
2016
 Patent Eligibility: A Response to Rejections Under 35 USC §101 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
19
2016
 No Time to Relax for Inflatable Lounger Companies Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
4
2014
 Judge Batten Grants Summary Judgement to Indiana Mills & Manufacturing against Pediatric Medical Devices Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
16
2019
 Federal Circuit Limits Design Patents to Identified Article of Manufacture Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Nov
5
2016
 Functional Claim Language, USPTO Training & Williamson: A Mechanical Perspective Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
16
2017
 State Universities Gain Immunity from IPRs Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
1
2016
 Claims Strategies in Patent Applications – Matching or Varied? Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
17
2019
 State Sovereignty 101: State Universities Not Immune to IPR Proceedings Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
29
2014
 A Powerful Tool: Challenging Assertion during Patent Prosecution Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
24
2018
 Supreme Court Inter Parties Review Decision - SAS INSTITUTE INC. v. IANCU Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
5
2013
 Let’s Continue with Insights about Software Patenting Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
15
2013
 Patent Eligibility of an Invention Implemented by Computers Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
25
2019
 Supreme Court: USPTO Ban on “Offensive” Trademark Registrations Unconstitutional Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Dec
18
2014
 Challenging “Obvious to Try” during Patent Prosecution Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
21
2017
 Don’t Fall for a Scam: Trademark Owners Targeted Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
5
2013
 Patent Practitioners and Writing Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Subscribe to Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins