Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Jun
7
2017
First Circuit Refuses to Recognize Section 1981 Private Right of Action for Damages Against State Actors Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Nov
7
2021
Court of Appeals Stays OSHA’s Emergency Temporary Standard Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Nov
16
2019
Oregon Court of Appeals Requires Employers to Pay Wages for Hourly Employees’ Failure to Take Full 30-Minute Meal Periods Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Oct
28
2020
A Deeper Dive Into Cal/OSHA Litigation, Part One: Appeals, Defenses, and Burdens of Proof [PODCAST] Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Nov
12
2020
Recent Texas Court Decision Highlights the Risks of Defamation in Internal Misconduct Investigations Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Apr
19
2023
Federal District Court’s Ruling on Affordable Care Act Preventive Care Eases Employer Burden—at Least for Now Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jan
1
2020
AB 51 Enjoined at the Last Minute: Court Issues TRO on California’s Arbitration Statute Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jan
13
2020
AB 51 Update: Court Continues TRO on California’s Arbitration Statute Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jan
13
2022
Louisiana Employers May Be Able to Discharge Unvaccinated Workers Under Employment-at-Will Doctrine Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Aug
24
2017
Plaintiffs’ Bar Targets Healthcare Facilities’ Timekeeping Practices Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jul
14
2010
Equal Opportunity Harasser's use of female-specific slurs and remarks can support claim of hostile work environment. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Aug
31
2017
Employer Victory: Fifth Circuit Judge Invalidates 2016 Overtime Regulations Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Sep
1
2017
Connecticut Court’s First Decision on Medical Marijuana Use Discrimination Is a Buzzkill for Employers Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Sep
6
2017
Connecticut Supreme Court Upholds Fluctuating Workweek Method . . . but Not for Retail Employees Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jun
8
2023
Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2023: Is It #TimesUp on #MeToo? [PODCAST] Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jun
9
2023
Right-to-Weed States: Assessing Impairment and Managing Employee Conduct in the Workplace Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jan
27
2021
Fifth Circuit Loss for Employee Who Refused Vaccine for Religious Reasons Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Feb
15
2022
No Grand Bargain: Illinois Supreme Court Rejects Exclusive Remedy Preemption in Privacy Act Class Actions Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jan
10
2019
Supreme Court Concludes “Wholly Groundless” Exception Is Inconsistent With Federal Arbitration Act Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Apr
7
2022
EEOC Roundup: Top 5 Takeaways for Employers on the 2021 Enforcement and Litigation Statistics Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Apr
8
2022
California Nonsolicitation Clause Held Enforceable Under Narrow Exception for Sale of a Business Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Dec
6
2017
Missouri Supreme Court Punts Two Lawsuits in a Row, on Direct Flights to Arbitration Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Dec
11
2017
Louisiana Governor Appeals LGBT Executive Order Ruling to State Supreme Court Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Feb
25
2019
Louisiana Court Finds Nonsolicitation/Noncompetition Agreement Is Enforceable Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Apr
25
2022
Federal Court: Employee’s Self-Serving Testimony and Discovery Responses Did Not Satisfy Burden of Proof on Summary Judgment Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Mar
3
2021
UK Tribunal Rules – ‘Stale’ Standalone Training Proves Insufficient Defence to Race Harassment Claim Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jul
15
2023
Whistleblowers and Trade Secrets: Does the DTSA Protect Confidential Data? Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
May
24
2022
California High Court Rules Missed Meal Break Premiums Are ‘Wages’ Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins