Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Oct
11
2019
OSI v. Apotex – Christmas in October! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
22
2013
Patent and Trademark Office Guidance for Examiners in Wake of CLS Bank Decision: No Change for Now Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
25
2014
Takeaways from Seattle Chisum Patent Academy Summer 2014 Seminars Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
14
2018
Ex parte Parenteau – PTAB Skips Step One of the Mayo/Alice Test? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
5
2016
Rapid Litigation v. CellzDirect – A Break in the Section 101 Wall Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
1
2020
Criminal Copyright Infringement of Alita Movie Leads to 4-Year Prison Sentence in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
8
2024
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Working Procedures for the Construction and Operation of the People’s Court Case Database Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
11
2017
Athena Diagnostics v. Mayo – Finessing the Correlations Trap? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2023
Chinese Utility Model Grants Down Over 21% in 2023 Q1 YoY; Trademark Grants Down Almost 53% Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
21
2020
Beijing Intellectual Property Court Fines Three Litigants for Forging Evidence in Trademark Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
18
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Announces Rapid 20-Day Trademark Application Examination Program Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
7
2011
CLS Bank Int’l: DC District Court Drives Stake into “Heart” of Business Method Patents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
9
2011
Petitions Practice for SNQ Findings in Inter Partes Reexaminations Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
3
2021
China Sanctions Two Firms for Filing “Abnormal” Patent Applications Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
17
2014
Target Corp. Requests Rehearing of Denied Inter Partes Review by Expanded Patent Trial and Appeal Board Panel Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
9
2011
Supreme Court decides Stanford v. Roche – Clarifies Scope of Bayh-Dole Act Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
6
2013
Australia – High Court Decision on Methods of Medical Treatment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
14
2020
Chinese Patent Office Releases Patent Statistics for First Two Months of Coronavirus Epidemic Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
13
2013
Joint Motions to Terminate Patent Reviews Late in Trial Proceedings Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2020
Chinese Rail System for Restaurant Meal Delivery Patent Infringed Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
1
2012
Federal Circuit Orders Briefing in Myriad Remand Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
29
2014
The Settlement Effect of PTAB Proceedings and Recent Patent Office Trial Statistics Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
17
2012
Why Myriad Should Drop Its Appeal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
15
2018
Do You Really Want to File for Pharma Patent Protection in Canada, India or Ecuador? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2020
China Issues Ruling in First 5G Criminal Intellectual Property Law Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
12
2015
Financial Product Search System Found Patent Ineligible Under Section 101 by Delaware Court Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
15
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases 2023 People’s Courts Typical Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2019
Claims of Uniloc Patents Covering a Software Distribution System Found Patent Eligible by Federal Circuit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins