Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Sep
18
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Court Again Affirms Right to Set Global FRAND Rates in Standard Essential Patents in Nokia/OPPO Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
28
2016
Superman Breyer v. Batman Lourie Battle in Sequenom Petition for Cert. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
2
2021
USPTO Publishes Interim Process for Director’s Review of PTAB Decisions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
6
2013
Oral Arguments in CLS Bank Give Hope to Both Sides Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
29
2018
Ex Parte Smith: What We’ve Got Here Is A Failure To Communicate! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
19
2021
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation Releases Typical Unfair Competition Case List Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
30
2022
China to Add Statement of Use Requirement for Trademarks? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
18
2013
Myriad Patent Case Argued Before The Supreme Court – Some Snippets Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
20
2013
SAP v. Versata: First Covered Business Method Patent Trial and Appeal Board Trial Tests New AIA (America Invents Act) Trial Provisions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
17
2022
Mast-Jägermeister SE Wins 10 Million RMB at Beijing IP Court for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
7
2021
Xiaoi Robot Seeks Preliminary Injunction Against Apple in Shanghai Patent Infringement Suit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
22
2015
Board Limits Multiple IPR Challenges in Samsung Electronics v. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
15
2024
France’s Arkema S.A. Sues Shanghai Huayi Group Co., Ltd. for 430 Million RMB Patent Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
14
2020
Chinese Patent Prosecution Flow Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
13
2020
C. R. Bard v. Angiodynamics – It’s a Labelled Injection Port, not a Label Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
28
2019
Bruce Lee Enterprises, LLC Sues Chinese Fast Food Chain for IP Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
9
2013
Divided Federal Circuit Panel Finds Computer System Claims Not Patent-Eligible Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
15
2015
Sequenom’s En Banc Petition Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
12
2013
Cert. Denied in Intema Ltd. v. PerkinElmer, Inc. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
23
2011
Supreme Court Grants Cert. In Mayo v. Prometheus Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
2
2022
Qualcomm v. Apple – Pyrrhic Victory for Qualcomm? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
30
2011
Divided Panel Finds DNA Molecules Patentable – Cancer Screening Claims Too Abstract Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
3
2011
Wegner Paper Probes Myriad Decisions Flaws Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
9
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Court: New Evidence Can be Entered in Patent Administrative Litigation for Invalidation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
8
2014
Commil USA v. Cisco Systems – Induced Infringement In For Clarification Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
1
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Second Batch of Guiding Cases of Administrative Enforcement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
21
2020
Episode 01: Techniques and Analytics for Identifying Valuable Patents and Patents to Abandon Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
3
2014
Amici Curiae Brief of Microsoft, Adobe and Hewlett-Packard: Alice Corp’s Patent Does Not Claim a Technological Innovation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins