Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Aug
30
2014
U.S. Bancorp CBM Results in Cancellation of Retirement Capital Access Management Co.’s Patent Claims Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
1
2020
Criminal Copyright Infringement of Alita Movie Leads to 4-Year Prison Sentence in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
16
2023
Wuxi Intermediate People’s Court Upholds 4.5 Year Prison Sentence for Chinese Trademark Scammer Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
8
2021
Guangdong Higher People’s Court Rules for Tencent in China’s First Game Map Copyright Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2023
Beijing IP Court Awards Dassault 20 Million RMB in CATIA Copyright Infringement Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
10
2022
Novartis v. Accord – No Limits on Negative Limitations? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
30
2014
American Calcar v. Amer. Honda Motor Co. – Therasense Goes Out For a Test Drive Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
16
2013
Supreme Court Will Not Review Therasense Standards – Yet Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
21
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases 14th Five-Year Plan for Patent and Trademark Examination Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
29
2016
Alice v. CLS Bank Software Patents Scorecard, Two Years Later Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
21
2011
Federal Circuit Decision in In re Tanaka Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
10
2014
Card Verification v. Citigroup: Software Patent Survives 12(b)(6) Abstract Idea Attack Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
14
2023
2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were ‘Abnormal’ Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
18
2013
Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Alps South, LLC – Inequitable Conduct Lives! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
27
2011
Therasense Returns Common Sense to Law of Inequitable Conduct Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
26
2020
Shanghai People’s Procuratorate Launches Criminal Prosecution of Lego Block Infringers Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
30
2015
Shire v. Amneal Pharma – Adjusting the Rearview Mirror Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
31
2011
Obviousness Objections Based On Combinations Of References – Consistent Warnings From The CAFC Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
28
2019
Barry v. Medtronic – Be Careful What You Use and Sell! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
29
2012
Legal Challenge To “ObamaCare” Threatens Generic Biologicals Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
21
2014
Federal Circuit Reaffirms Cybor Standard in Lightning Ballast Rehearing Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2020
China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate Issues Top Example Cases of Criminal Intellectual Property Rights Infringement in 2019 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
3
2014
GlaxoSmithKline v. Banner Pharmacaps – Written Description Requirement 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
8
2020
The China National Intellectual Property Administration Announces Top 10 Patent Invalidation Cases of 2019 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
20
2015
Pacing Technologies v. Garmin – D&D Explained Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2019
Claims of Uniloc Patents Covering a Software Distribution System Found Patent Eligible by Federal Circuit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
3
2012
Supreme Court Grants Myriad’s Petition for Cert. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
23
2021
China National Intellectual Property Administration to Give Priority to Patent Invalidation Cases Involved in Concurrent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins