Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Jun
6
2016
PTAB Relies on Federal Circuit’s Recent Section 101 Decision to Deny CBM Institution Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
11
2014
Indefiniteness After The Supreme Court Nautilus Decision – A Very “Delicate Balance” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
22
2024
China’s Supreme People’s Court Hold IP Press Conference and Releases Report on 2023 IP Protection Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
1
2020
Criminal Copyright Infringement of Alita Movie Leads to 4-Year Prison Sentence in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
31
2017
Inequitable Conduct Intent Prong Due to Litigation Misconduct Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
16
2023
Wuxi Intermediate People’s Court Upholds 4.5 Year Prison Sentence for Chinese Trademark Scammer Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
11
2017
Athena Diagnostics v. Mayo – Finessing the Correlations Trap? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
10
2019
Solicitor General Signals Supreme Court to Address the Confusion Caused by the Abstract Idea Exception to 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
21
2020
Beijing Intellectual Property Court Fines Three Litigants for Forging Evidence in Trademark Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
11
2022
Shanghai’s No. 3 Intermediate Court Sentences DuPont Counterfeiter to 2+ Years in Prison Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
2
2013
Novozymes Looses “Possession” Of Its Enzyme Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
3
2021
China Sanctions Two Firms for Filing “Abnormal” Patent Applications Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
12
2013
Supreme Court takes up CLS Bank v. Alice – Clarification or More Obfuscation To Come? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
24
2013
Litigation Defendants Cannot Rely on Joinder to Avoid Timing Requirements of Inter Partes Reviews Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
14
2020
Chinese Patent Office Releases Patent Statistics for First Two Months of Coronavirus Epidemic Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
24
2014
Lightning Ballast II – Judge Lourie Tries to Get to “The Facts of the Matter” Re: Intellectual Property Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2020
Chinese Rail System for Restaurant Meal Delivery Patent Infringed Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
15
2018
Do You Really Want to File for Pharma Patent Protection in Canada, India or Ecuador? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
27
2014
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) s.101 Guidelines – How to “Eviscerate Patent Law” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2020
China Issues Ruling in First 5G Criminal Intellectual Property Law Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
8
2012
Supreme Court to Review Monsanto v. Bowman Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
12
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court Again Affirms Right to Set Global Licensing Rates for Standard Essential Patents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2019
Claims of Uniloc Patents Covering a Software Distribution System Found Patent Eligible by Federal Circuit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
7
2023
Shenzhen Proposes Ending Patent Grant Subsidies Two Years Early Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
30
2018
Fed. Cir. Affirms Unclean Hands Defense in Gilead v. Merck Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
23
2021
China National Intellectual Property Administration to Give Priority to Patent Invalidation Cases Involved in Concurrent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
10
2022
Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
19
2014
CLS v Alice – Abstract Idea, Wherefore Art Thou? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins