Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Sep
30
2014
American Calcar v. Amer. Honda Motor Co. – Therasense Goes Out For a Test Drive Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
10
2013
Case Law of the European Patent Office (EPO) Boards of Appeal Released Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
10
2014
Card Verification v. Citigroup: Software Patent Survives 12(b)(6) Abstract Idea Attack Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
6
2011
Oracle Ordered to Reduce the Number of Patent Infringement Claims against Google Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
30
2015
Shire v. Amneal Pharma – Adjusting the Rearview Mirror Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
20
2016
UCB v. Yeda R&D Co. – No “Safe Harbor” for Unamended Claims Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
17
2020
Illumina v. Ariosa – The “Bucket” to be in Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
11
2016
Federal Circuit Affirms 101 Ineligibility of a Patent Claiming Detection of Unauthorized Access to Medical Information Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
23
2019
Supreme Court Rules That “Secret Sales” Can Qualify as Prior Art Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
21
2011
Prometheus’s Supreme Court Brief – Don’t Confuse Us With “LabCorp” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases of 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
15
2018
Do You Really Want to File for Pharma Patent Protection in Canada, India or Ecuador? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
27
2014
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) s.101 Guidelines – How to “Eviscerate Patent Law” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
20
2015
Pacing Technologies v. Garmin – D&D Explained Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
10
2020
China’s Supreme People’s Court Rules Customer Lists are Not Trade Secrets Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
8
2012
Supreme Court to Review Monsanto v. Bowman Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2019
Bipartisan “Draft Bill” to Amend ss. 100, 101 and 112 Released for Comment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
28
2022
Even the Chinese Government isn’t Safe from Counterfeiters: China Cracks Down on Counterfeit Mail Trucks Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
2
2021
China’s National Copyright Administration Releases Top Ten Criminal Infringement and Piracy Cases of 2020 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
30
2018
Fed. Cir. Affirms Unclean Hands Defense in Gilead v. Merck Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
19
2014
CLS v Alice – Abstract Idea, Wherefore Art Thou? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
28
2021
Chemours Co. v. Daikin Industries – Back to Some IP Basics Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
18
2016
Limelight Networks v. Akamai Tech. – Supreme Court Cert. Denied Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
12
2015
OIP Technologies Inc., v. Amazon.com, Inc, (Fed. Cir. 2012-1696) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2013
CLS Bank International v. Alice Corporation: Poison Apple Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
16
2016
Patent Prosecution: “Unclean Hands” Doctrine Erases Merck’s Damage Award Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2019
Federal Circuit Rules that PTAB Judges are Unconstitutionally Appointed Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
23
2021
China’s Shanghai Pudong Court Sentences 69 Defendants for Counterfeiting Chanel, Cartier and Gucci Products for up to 5 Years 9 Months with a $1.8 Million USD Fine Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins