Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Sep
4
2014
Planet Bingo, LLC v. VKGS LLC: Bingo Invention Fails Abstract Idea Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
3
2013
SAP Joins Patent and Trade Office against Versata in Eastern District of Virginia Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
17
2013
Senator Leahy Urges National Institutes of Health (NIH) to Exercise “March-in” Rights on Myriad’s Tests Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
16
2023
Wuxi Intermediate People’s Court Upholds 4.5 Year Prison Sentence for Chinese Trademark Scammer Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
22
2016
Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple, Inc. – Defining “Common Sense” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
8
2021
Guangdong Higher People’s Court Rules for Tencent in China’s First Game Map Copyright Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
19
2015
Takeaways from Seattle Chisum Patent Academy 2015 Seminars Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2023
Beijing IP Court Awards Dassault 20 Million RMB in CATIA Copyright Infringement Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
8
2021
Wyeth Wins 30.55 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case with Punitive Damages Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
10
2022
Novartis v. Accord – No Limits on Negative Limitations? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
6
2020
Method of Treatment Efficacy Benchmarks Avoid Inherency Attack Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
21
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases 14th Five-Year Plan for Patent and Trademark Examination Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2013
Synthes v. Spinal Kinetics – When “Structure” is Not Enough Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
2
2011
Appeals Court Overturns Stem Cell Ban Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
6
2017
Federal Circuit’s Aqua Products Decision Clarifies Burden on IPR Petitioner to Challenge Amended Claims Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
14
2023
2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were ‘Abnormal’ Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
30
2011
Therasense Makes Sense of Inequitable Conduct Defense Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
16
2020
INO v. Praxair – Time for the Supreme Court to Step Up to the Plate? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
17
2020
Illumina v. Ariosa – The “Bucket” to be in Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
13
2014
C.I.T. v. Hughes Comm. – Survival Guide for Software? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
25
2023
15 Rolex Counterfeiters Sentenced to up to 6.5 Years Prison in 300 Million RMB Counterfeit Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
2
2015
Section 101 at the AIPLA Midwinter Meeting --American Intellectual Property Law Association Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
1
2020
Illumina v. Ariosa – Fed. Cir. Splits a Fine s. 101 Hair Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
21
2014
Eastern District of Virginia Decides PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) Decision to not institute IPR (Inter Partes Review) is Not Appealable Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
10
2020
China’s Supreme People’s Court Rules Customer Lists are Not Trade Secrets Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
24
2014
Eastern District of Texas Denies SAP’s Motion to Vacate the Judgment in the Versata Patent Infringement Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
24
2012
Appellate Court Ruling Permits Continued NIH Funding of Embryonic Stem Cell Research Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2014
Chief Justice Rader of the Federal Circuit Steps Down – Prost Steps Up Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins